There's been a lot of ad hominem flying around in these posts. Let's bring it back within the posting guidelines, gents.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > You have no idea what the post is referring to? LOL Yeah OK, e > spaced out! > > You are a piece of work, one that I'm done with. I don't want to > waste anymore time. > > Adios! > > On Apr 27, 3:50 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: >> im sorry, i have little idea what this post is referring to...i havent >> been offended so far, but keep trying lol >> >> On Apr 27, 11:00 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Synonym for "wow". Alleged etymology: A way of saying "Jesus!" without >> > being accused of swearing. More often used as a negative exclamation >> > than a positive one. >> >> >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gee%20wiz >> >> > Caustic? LOL I'm sure Orn was up all night crying his eyes out! >> > Stop projecting your own interpretation, regardless of the inaccuracy, >> > onto Orn. >> >> > 'superficial, >> > frenetic, without depth, simplistic interpretation, mental cache dump, >> > etc.<<< espace >> >> > Caustic? Lesson? Teacher? Preach? What? >> >> > Again you project your own timidity upon other readers. If you are >> > offended it is your personal choice to feel that way but that in and >> > of itself does not attach new meaning to words very commonly used in >> > Minds Eye, many of which I learned to use from others, including >> > Orn. >> >> > I would have to ask other members if you have any clue of what you are >> > saying because I certainly don't think you know what you are talking >> > about. Unless of course I get out my espace dictionary. >> >> > On Apr 27, 7:03 am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > if the answer is gee whiz, one would then have to ask, is gee whiz a >> > > short form for jesus? >> >> > > i believe u misinterpreted OM's post. i think she was agreeing with >> > > u. >> >> > > just a thought...you might want to consider changing the terminology >> > > you use to something a bit more pallatable for the readers of your >> > > responses? you refer to others posts using words such as 'superficial, >> > > frenetic, without depth, simplistic interpretation, mental cache dump, >> > > etc. if one is trying to get a point across it is much better to do so >> > > without attempting to offend the other, because if u do, even if the >> > > words u are saying make sense, the reader will not have a good >> > > interpretation of the 'lesson', because they will not appreciate the >> > > 'teacher'...your 'meaning' doesnt have to be 'demeaning'. u have some >> > > good thoughts and comments...if they were slightly less caustic they >> > > might be a bit easier to swallow...again, just an observation >> >> > > On Apr 27, 1:31 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > In your situation there is a huge difference, in that the group is not >> > > > local to your community. Actually, I don't really see the comparison, >> > > > that would be like me hanging with the Pope and then expecting a phone >> > > > call from the Vatican. Still, I would think that at least one person >> > > > from the whole should reach out, there is some degree of failure there >> > > > on their part. Let me also add that you did not just fail to show up >> > > > the next day while recording his speeches which would/should trigger a >> > > > concern as to your well being, I would think. >> >> > > > Your simplistic interpretation of my approach is superficial, without >> > > > depth. Failure to show any concern for someone who becomes part of a >> > > > spiritual family in a local community church is a reflection of the >> > > > congregates ability to live up to the spiritual tenets that they >> > > > purport to espouse. I would expect, after months of playing/singing >> > > > for the choir and receiving expressions of gratitude, for >> > > > gratuitousness and ability, from attendees that someone would ask >> > > > someone else what happened to the player/singer, with the reply >> > > > being, I don't know we need to call and see if all is well. It is >> > > > very simple really, especially when you consider that the congregation >> > > > (not an organization) may only consist of a hundred members or less. >> > > > So your judgment on the matter of my judgment is incorrect, partially >> > > > because I had failed to initially present the related and relevant >> > > > facts. It is years ago now anyway and I haven't any affiliations nor >> > > > need of any so it doesn't matter, but if I did I would rather belong >> > > > to a family instead of an organization. >> > > > Part of the problem is the lack of instilling that sense of family >> > > > within the spiritual community. They take your money, your time and >> > > > service and then you return to being a number, not a member. I >> > > > personally expect more from a group, any group, in which I would spend >> > > > my time engaging in spirituality. This is one area where collective >> > > > mentality would make a significant difference. As you say, we are >> > > > one, at least we should be! >> >> > > > Thank You! >> > > > I rest my case. >> >> > > > There will be a short recess and then the jury will decide the >> > > > verdict, unless Judge Judy calls in, and now a word from our >> > > > sponsors. >> >> > > > Need a new car? Call gruff's auto! >> >> > > > By the way, orn, is geezzz short for gee wiz or Jesus?- Hide quoted >> > > > text - >> >> > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
