On Aug 23, 9:19 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> It doesn't say "Billy Bob has an ulcer, therefore Hot Peppers do not
> have any nutritional value", I don't understand how you think like
> that, it's fundamental logic.
It might be your fundamental logic but not mine. I don't know which is
correct yet. I see it as an unfair comparison.
You took the phrase "good for" and applied it unfairly, without a
clear definition. For if Billy did not have an ulcer would peppers
be good for him? Now "good for" has changed due to circumstance.
We have not defined "good for" properly yet.
> You pick apart the Hot Peppers when that is not the issue.
You seem to view "picking apart" as an undesirable. I don't. I think
it is extremely imortant in order to understand something.
>The
> nutritional content of the peppers is aside from the question "are
> they good for everyone?".
You haven't said WHY they are good for "anyone" yet. I suggested it
might be due to some ingredient that has benefits. We have to agree
on the full definition first. Just as an example, if we injected
Billy with the "ingredient" (if that is the reason why it is "good"
for anyone) instead of eating it, which might be the only reason it is
"not good" for Billy, you would have made a "deceiving" statement.
Does that make any sense?
> A chili pepper might be good for Juan but it might not be good for a 2
> week old baby.
I am saying there are completely "valid" relative arguments. I am no
concerned with those.
> We can't change an "absolute truth" with relativism. Fire is hot and
> it burns, so one cannot say "Fire doesn't burn me only you".
There is a gell that is used in special effects. You can be set on
fire with it (for a while) so is your statement
really universally true?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
