Man you are one of us, you joined, you participated, you are one of
us.

On 25 Aug, 03:00, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Look, I get , and I take no offense from your joust here at all. I
> wish you had done that more often in fact.  I made a  rather large
> mistake.  I regret it.
> It was titled a dark view, and it was mine alone, for some stupid
> reason I deicided to share it,  but that is no excuse.  I am not
> stable enough mentally to handle it in here.  What can I say.  And to
> Lee,  it is not about my lack of logical skills, I think I have some,
> not enough, but I have made good , solid points.  It is about my
> mental state.  Pretend I am one of "you"  and just forgive me like you
> would any  illness, and let it go.  Otherwise go ahead and bash the
> person who is not  stable mentally.
>
> I am taking a break, I may or may not be back.  I apologize to all for
> the cantakerous and the Elvis and whatever else you think I am.
> "Cantankerous"  is a "style" by the way, just not often adopted by
> most for good reasons.
>
> On Aug 23, 11:59 pm, frantheman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Selected takes from Surveillance System 3BE-45 / [various dates] /
> > rating: TS (Board members only)
>
> > Mod#1: I’m worried about BB. He’s getting too close.
>
> > Mod#2: You mean …?
>
> > Mod#1: Yes, he may just be getting to a level where he starts to
> > conceive suspicions about our true intent and purpose.
>
> > Mod#2: The achievement of total and complete word domination?
>
> > Mod#1: Precisely. This COULD become a new keith/Kevin attack.
>
> > Mod#2: You mean, the longer you leave it, the worse it gets? If that’s
> > the case, then we’d better do something soon –
>
> > [Com unit blinks. A crackle of static.]
>
> > FA#7: Field agent seven here. Mod#1, are you there?
>
> > Mod#1: Go ahead, FA#7, communications secured …
>
> > [short break – a new camera angle]
>
> > FA#7: … and we’re just not succeeding in our attacks on him in the
> > various threads. We can’t seem to faze the guy …
>
> > Mod#2: How do you know it’s a guy?
>
> > FA#7: Oh … oh, I see. We need more concrete information in order to …
>
> > Mod#1: … in order to deal with this situation – in a more permanent
> > manner …
>
> > Mod#2: Quite! Nothing must be allowed to disturb our glorious course
> > of world domination. The Dark Side WILL conquer!
>
> > On 23 Aug., 23:11, BB47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >   There are many ways to look at this group.  This is merely my dark
> > > version.  I will give you the upbeat positive version when I am in
> > > that mood, should I survive.
>
> > >    There is a sickness lurking in this group.  A stench fills the
> > > air.  I might be alone in smelling it.  A cancer has a foothold.  A
> > > callous detachment, a resignation, the players separated into packs
> > > and lone individuals.  The once human eyes roll back white, and when
> > > the attack is over, they roll forward to reveal their black , cold ,
> > > unaffected stares. It is a prison yard, a shark tank.  If only being
> > > wrong was not the ultimate horror of human beings.  What a different
> > > world we would live in.
>
> > >    There is less and less risks taken in here, and who could blame
> > > them? There are those safe in the shadows, who only come out to feed
> > > when it is safe.   Safety itself is now defined as back into self,
> > > where “I know and they don’t” rules supreme.    I see this as a sad
> > > statement of resignation and worship of a false idol.   An acceptance
> > > that this is the way of the world.  Any attempts at engagement are too
> > > easily  perceived as an assault or an attack,  then what follows is
> > > the silent retreat back to the perception of safety and
> > > righteousness.  Oh, the comfort of knowing  and they don’t.
>
> > >    Another shank stabbing  in the prison yard?  “That is what
> > > happens”   “he had it coming”   “he should have known better”   “You
> > > just don’t do that”  “He was a fool to try that”  “you don’t mess with
> > > somebody tougher than you”   “He picked the wrong person to fight
> > > with”    “doesn’t he know that guy’s reputation?  What an idiot”
> > > “You don’t mess with those above you in the pecking order, how could
> > > he not know that?”
> > > “He deserved it”  “hey, there is going to be a fight, come on let’s
> > > watch”  “I pay not attention to him, he is a child”  “ I am going to
> > > stick it to him someday”
>
> > >     People resort to using quotes of famous people.  Not that this is
> > > bad in and of itself, for it is valuable information,  but when looked
> > > at from the view of the prison yard,  this scores big points, it is
> > > relatively safe,  and it is certainly safer than using your own words
> > > which are much more vulnerable to attack.  It is like flashing a knife
> > > to another inmate,  “I have this weapon and more where that came from
> > > pal....at my fingertips, don’t mess with me.   I have protection.  I
> > > have back-up.  I have the CREDIBILITY,   I can’t be touched, don’t
> > > even try.  You are no match for me.”
>
> > >   As if being no match for another means a student can’t argue with
> > > the teacher.  The climate of fear, the climate of the pecking order,
> > > the climate of a prison yard.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to