I don’t know if any of you saw the movie “The Number 23”  starring Jim
Carrey?  (I don’t imagine many Jim Carrey fans out there)  but that is
what the “synchronicity” idea would lead to for me if I were to put
any “faith” into it.  I have had weird stuff happen to me, so there
might be something to it, but synchronicity is not for the fragile,
those not with a firm grasp and solid foundation, not for those with
an active imagination….in other words, not that great of a concept for
humans in general to be messing with.

  What is the “use” of this “information” exactly?  It seems natural
to me that any person who accepts that synchronicity is real is going
to look for more!  And if you seek , you shall find more.  Talk about
a runaway train!   And what does synchronicity say really?  “That
there is a “connection”  but the details and meaning are left up to
the receiver to figure out.   Instructions are not transmitted with
the mysterious messages.   The receiver “makes something” out of these
events.
This seems to have more danger to it than value.  To allow the
interpretation of the “event” as well as “if that was an event at
all”  seems to me to be the ultimate recipe for disaster.   But that
is just the way I see it.

   You may have the wisdom to interpret correctly, to use it and not
abuse it,  but I don’t see any checks and balances there.


On Aug 21, 5:08 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Synchronicity is a word that has come up now and then in these
> discussions and is, I think, becoming more a part of our scientific
> and philosophic paradigms.  Webster defines it as:  the quality or
> state of being synchronous or simultaneous : concurrence of acts,
> events, or developments in time : coincident movement or existence;
> chronological arrangement of historical events and personages so as to
> indicate coincidence or coexistence;  a representation in the same
> picture of two or more events which occurred at different times.
>
> Jung required a larger framework for his idea of synchronicity, a
> framework that reveals an underlying pattern for what he called
> "temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events."
>
> What does synchronicity mean to you?  What role does it play in your
> life?  What do YOU think?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to