/Uumm does Brazil urgently require plastic crud?/

Just trying out these new sarcasm errrr ummm ohhh yeah
'Intenticons'? ;¬)

On 1 Sep, 15:08, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> I saw someone on TV a few weeks back arguing that Brazil can grow all
> the UK's food and that we should throw in with the free trade notions
> of producing more and more plastic crud with superior design to
> exchange for it.  This is all dismally dumb.
>
> On 1 Sep, 10:28, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Wow you really have a bee in your bonnet about any form of Solialism
> > huh!
>
> > That aside though and since you have asked for critiqche of the logic
> > here then let me start with this:
>
> > 'Governments are ultimate authorities once they are established.  And
> > any “cause” the  government dreams up, well this becomes the “ends”
> > in effect, because the citizens of the country are rallied to “serve”
> > that cause, and once they commit to it, they are under obligation to
> > “serve their country.”'
>
> > There is a false premise here.  I am not 'obliged' to serve my country
> > if I do not wish to do so in this capacity.
>
> > There is also the question of whether the anology of conscription into
> > the armed forces and payment of taxes into a goverement system is a
> > valid one, I do not think it is.
>
> > >This is true in any other cause as well.  In socialism for example
> > > the cause is “we take care of those in need” and the key phrase is the
> > > same as in any war, and that is the word “sacrifice.”
>
> > Can you show what sacrifice there is in the payment of taxes?
>
> > >The people who would like to see everyone taken
> > > care of do not care much about the means.
>
> > Blatantly false, and your opinion only.
>
> >  This only shows they are
>
> > > using the philosophy, as they only like to talk about the cause.  The
> > > people who believe money is evil?  Their government requires it in
> > > vast amounts for their own cause and they don’t even see the
> > > contradiction.  They cannot come up with a replacement for the money
> > > concept perhaps because it is not important for them to do so, it is
> > > merely a “means”  which is not only secondary but not a consideration
> > > compared to their cause.
>
> > By  'the people' I guess you mean me, as I am the only one that I'm
> > aware of that has said anything like this.
>
> > I do not belive the money is evil, money is a think, it is like me
> > saying that my sofa is evil, not that just does not make sense.
>
> > I belive that the concept of money has and contiunes to bring great
> > evil into the world, I agree with the bible that the love of money is
> > the root of evil, and I have already said that I have no idea how to
> > initiate the (what I have already admited is a foolish flight of
> > fantasy) idea, so lets not get too hung up on that one.
>
> > So there realy is no contridiction to see.
>
> > Now to the heart of the matter.
>
> > You agree that paying taxes is fair, so it seems that your only
> > problem is the use of such taxes in programs of social benifit to
> > thoese that need the aid of sociaty.  And perhaps the amount of taxes
> > that the rich pay?
>
> > Seems pretty selfish does it not?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to