RE: Red Book Slip, and all…the Jung family has already made the contracts etc. about the book. It will even come to the states for a showing in a museum.
And, not only will all of the pictures be in it, it (the book) is a facsimile of the original…painstakingly photocopied in great detail… not only the German script, but all of the pictures too…each and every page of the original. This is the body of the book. For the English version, there is a full translation into English at the back with well over 1,000 detailed footnotes. And even though the upcoming release does not have a title yet (I vote for ‘The Red Book’), Amazon already advertises a pre-release deal. One can save 40% ($78.00 US) and for a mere $117 ($195.00 retail) you can order your own copy. The following link has a few of the photocopied pages reproduced from the Amazon site. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/0393065677/sr=1-1/qid=1253386678/ref=dp_images_all?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1253386678&sr=1-1 So, one will be able to see and read the entire ‘original’ text, all pictures included. On Sep 19, 6:36 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt they will transfer all the images in the Red Book to the New > Book. But we'll see, I'm sure the family will have much to say about > it. Thanks for the links, Orn. > > On Sep 19, 12:50 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Some graphics from the Red Book... > > >http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/09/20/magazine/20jung.3.ready.... > > > ...found in a long article. > > > On Sep 18, 5http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/magazine/20jung-t.html? > > pagewanted=1&_r=1 > > > :47 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You don't miss an opportunity to squawk my friend. Have you given any > > > thought about how fixation on political fraudulence may affect > > > health. I would have to agree on all counts as they make presentation > > > but I do have a tendency to recognize the inability to effect the > > > ongoing dilemma and toss if off like water on a ducks back. It makes > > > for better dreaming. > > > > On Sep 18, 7:10 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I have not been immune to dead elephants in my dreams. Watching > > > > Newsnight last night I wished I was dreaming. The banality of our > > > > political explanations is a reality not worth bearing. > > > > > On 17 Sep, 13:50, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm looking forward to the published release. I always look forward > > > > > to dreaming, I think Jung was really onto something in the private > > > > > lair of his psyche. I'm extremely interested in seeing much of the > > > > > artwork and hope they don't hold back, there could be a great deal of > > > > > significance just in the pictures. Let's hope it's the full version. > > > > > > On Sep 17, 12:09 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > ...looks like it might be a good read.... > > > > > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/magazine/20jung-t.html?_r=2&hpw=&pa...quoted > > > > > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
