Ummm while there seems to be wisdom in that statement I'm, gonna have to call you out and suggest that you do not always say what you mean. Nobody is 100% honest at all times my friend.
As for listening for double meansings, that way lies madness and paronoia. I know some things, not too much but one thing I know for certian, is that life is never simple, and one line philosophies appied to all situations just do not work. Flexibility is the name of the game, to take a poker players view 'Know when to hold and when to fold'. On 19 Sep, 05:45, [email protected] wrote: > Here is my criterion fro trust: Isay what I mean and I mean what I say. Thus > trust implies a congruity between stated intentions and reliable follow > through. The way to spot distrust is to listen for double messages. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Slip Disc <[email protected]> > To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Sep 18, 2009 1:30 am > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: trust and efficacy > > This may be true, but is, your god, trustworthy enough to not steer > you into the abyss, the chasm of despair? > Trust was it I read in thread, trust from those who lull the fold into > complacent bliss before they drop the axe upon the necks of the > unwary? We've been cajoled into thinking trust was understood to > exist without question from those who stand in glowing circles on top > of the hill. It is only of late, and that meaning at least the past > 40 years, that we have seen the sheer curtain fray, exposing the > reality of what we thought was trust, what we learned was trust, as a > virtue, as a noble position. > Trust has been trampled beyond recognition and like cleaning out the > old cupboard full of dust and cobwebs so must the old guard be swept > away making way for a fresh, new trust. A trust that is real and not > the facade of a royal duping. If it stays the current course we can > all assume the name of Ben Dover. > > On Sep 18, 12:04?am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > We atheists must rally round our god and treely priest. > > > On 18 Sep, 02:10, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'll be sure to check it out. I'm hoping SOMETIME to finally get back > > > across > > > the water for a bit. Pollard already said we could have an Atheist > > > convention at his place. I want to head into Wales while there and shake > > > out > > > the roots of this family tree. > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:05 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There's a great Welsh-themed novel 'Aberwrystwith Rendezvous' if you > > > > haven't caught it Chris - includes details of the secret Welsh war of > > > > Patagonian Independence - not far off the dreams I used to have when > > > > on working holidays at my Uncle's farm in the district. ?I was always > > > > referred to as the English cousin there - I'd have been very annoyed > > > > had I known I was born in Scotland at the time! ?Sadly, they all upped- > > > > sticks to New Zealand. > > > > > On 18 Sep, 01:35, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > And I'm a > Yank whose family's from Wales, so what does that make me? :D > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:06 PM, archytas <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > That's only because the Welsh are such soft targets Chris. > > > > > > > On 18 Sep, 00:09, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh, sure, blame the Yank. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:05 PM, archytas <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Francis will no doubt soon be telling us the only way to eat a > > > > > > > > Scottish steam pigeon is to batter it, wrap it in Mars bar and > > > > > > > > fry > > > > the > > > > > > > > whole thing. ?One can trust to this, but not to efficacy in > > > > > > > > eating > > > > > > > > same! ?Speaking of bird, one can see trust as a rather nasty > > > > > > > > Nietzschean elitist concept of trusting the Herren. ?I should > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > known Jenkins would lead us into fowl waters! ?I rather prefer > > > > Molly's > > > > > > > > more delicate taste on trust. ?That we are all feeling low on > > > > efficacy > > > > > > > > seems about right. > > > > > > > > > On 17 Sep, 09:25, "[email protected]" < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Pigeon! ?Never eaten it, butchered it plenty of times, it's > > > > really > > > > > > > > > very tiny, blood red in colour and slimey, nope it doesn't > appeal > > > > to > > > > > > > > > me at all. > > > > > > > > > > On 17 Sep, 04:52, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I'd make a fine Scot, I think, but steamed pigeons sounds > > > > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > unappetizing fare. Can't we roast them? > > > > > > > > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:archytas <[email protected] > > > > > > >To:"\"Minds > > > > > > > > Eye\"" <[email protected]>Date:Tue, 15 Sep 2009 > > > > > > > > 15:46:24 > > > > > > -0700 > > > > > > > > (PDT)Local:Tues 15 Sep 2009 23:46Subject:[Mind's Eye] Re: trust > and > > > > > > efficacy > > > > > > > > > > > My 'triune Britain' actually might look a bit more like what > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > have happened if that Wel > sh chap Owen Glyndur hadn't been let > > > > down > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > that Hotspur chappie. ?I intend no part of government and > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > return > > > > > > > > > > to my former pastime of making steam-driven toys for > > > > > > > > > > children. > > > > ?I > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > volunteer to sponsor Jenkins as a naturalised Greater Scot > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > order > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > take him on as an apprentice steam pigeon builder. > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Sep, 19:24, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > *laughing* > > > > > > > > > > > > No need, my friend. I believe we all know where we stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, frantheman < > > > > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please, Chris, not gun control, not again, > > > > pleeeeeeeaaaaaase! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Sep., 20:00, Chris Jenkins < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, we warned you...cum catapultae proscriptae erunt > > > > tum > > > > > > soli > > > > > > > > proscript > > > > > > > > > > > > > catapultas habebunt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM, frantheman < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 Sep., 19:14, retiredjim34 <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Watch out. This is a very dangerous idea - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dividing > > > > > > England > > > > > > > > in three. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, Britain. In preparation for his new > > > > professional > > > > > > > > conquests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the East, Neilus Archytas Caesar has decided to > > > > revise > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > of his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > old works with the new opening: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Britannia est omnis divisa in partes tres ..." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
