India has a latecomer on the solutions are rightly well put--there IEB goverment should be concern--The global average surface tempeture has risen o.6-o.2'C and 0.17Cper decade in last 30 yrs..The industrialization very little to the accumulation of greenhouse -gas emissions that cause global warming..India Farming as had such drops and losses in this area because of their industries--and glad they are coming in ...If the Globel Warming continues the warming will continue and have more chain reaction to work and Farming ect.--with temperatures projected to increase by 1.4Cto 5.8C between 1990 and 2100--India is known for their Steel,Engineering and Machine Tools, Electronics, Textiles...India is a major exporter heavy and light engineering goods -cement, Fertilizer,mining and Petrochemical and mining equipment are made in India...This goes back 122 yrs..and they have put in new plants-Steel at Bhilai,Durgapur and Rourkela-and two more steel plants Bokaro and Vishakhapatbam--Their Private sector plants, of which the Tata Iron and Steel and scap..they also have diesel engines ....and now are making (air pollution control equipments)...In there Electronics---they way over a billion dollars in this---The problem with Globel Warming ---three Factor's (CARBON- DIOXIDE AND METHANE) their people in India is very upset--the farmers are haveing trouble growing as the warming continues...and many other problems also..dj
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:06 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I would point out Francis, that stirring the shit is environmentally > unsound (all that methane). At the back of this stuff is the madness > of capitalism based on consumption and routine overbreeding. Science > as a world-view has not caught on. > > On 24 Nov, 23:29, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > In fact, I find nothing at all curious about the tactics (resistance) > > to dealing with things ecological when it comes to China and the US. > > As far as I can tell, in both cases the real power is to be found in > > multinational organizations and not provincial local politics. This is > > yet another example of the results of aspects of capitalism. > > > > And, regardless of cause, the effect of climate change is obvious. > > Here I have little doubt as to the human component when it comes to > > major aspects of the cause. As fran points out, even if it is just a > > little ‘help’, unless one is so very skeptical and stolid as to reject > > all efforts for change, perhaps even based on a belief in the need to > > cull the herd, quick and committed action is needed quite soon, like > > yesterday! > > > > While not literally true, the myth about putting a frog in cold water > > and slowly bringing it to a boil is instructive. > > > > On Nov 24, 1:17 pm, fran the man <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On December 7 the climate summit in Copenhagen begins. Already, the > > > chances of it achieving anything worthwhile seem to be slim. While the > > > Europeans are pushing for concrete, binding levels of CO2-reduction, a > > > curious Sino-US alliance (backed by other Asian-Pacific countries) > > > seem intent on preventing the emergence of anything more than sonorous > > > platitudes. > > > > > I'm well aware that regular posters here have sharply differing views > > > on global warming, so I thought I might stir the s**t a bit :-) Here's > > > a link to the latest press release of a group of experts which sees > > > the situation as being even more dramatic than has been thought up to > > > now (the link also contains a further link to a download of the full > > > report in PDF-format). > > > > >http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.com/press.html > > > > > Of particular concern, it seems to me, are the figures relating to the > > > melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice-sheets, as well as the > > > Arctic sea ice and the consequent rise in sea-levels. If the prognosis > > > is even half-right here, both Alan and Chris are going to soon have to > > > put their houses on stilts! (Yes, Chris, I know you're not expecting > > > it.) > > > > > Francis > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
