I understand exactly what you said.. What you are saying is your supreme truth is a combination of all truth.. it that is the case you have to begin by starting to cover all of the truths that comprise the supreme truth.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote: > I've said whatever there was. Few understand, most do not. I am not > surprised that you do not. I responded because you asked for it. I am not surprised by your answer is SOP, "belittle the person that questions your ideas so you make them look small." Experience has taught me those that belittle others have little themselves to share. You would have to take it or leave it. > > > The hint of person - mouthing I had previously sensed only spoke to me > of how ' the jar was full.' Which is why I did not respond to the question earlier. > Strangely I understand just how empty a full jar really is > > And, Allan, I see ME as a forum where we express what we think and > believe, not because whether it agrees with ( that of ) others or not. > You do not have to ask anything ' once again.' > Yes ME is a forum for our expression of ideas, at the same time it is a place to have those ideas challenged. This allows for the clarity of ideas and concepts. > Because I am no teacher, eh ! > You said it not me.. Allan > > > > On Nov 26, 3:11 pm, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Amazing > > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
