On 8 Feb, 23:34, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > You forgot to put the "anything exists" in line. >
Well, some things only exist as abstracts. That's as close as I'll come to an 'anything exists' statement. Happy? > On 8 Feb., 18:16, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 8 Feb, 17:07, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8 February 2010 15:38, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 1) Things exist. > > > > 2) Some things exist in spatial proximity to others. > > > > 3) Some things exist in temporal proximity to others. > > > > I would like to introduce you to new logical fallacy: Reducto el > > > Harringtonium. > > > > Ian > > > Nice name, but where's the fallacy? Point that out and then you can > > make the full statement.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
