So, Vamadevananda, could it be said that the Vedas are more for the
general population, while the Upanishads provide a deeper, mystical
sort of knowledge?
Do you know whether, in the history of India, was there a time when
the Vedas provided the basis for the laws and the government?  Or, to
your knowledge, was there always a secular government while the Vedas
were the core teaching of the religion only?

Pardon me for heaping on questions, but I know very little about any
of this.  All I have ever encountered of the Hindu Faith has been the
Bagavad Gita, and I did not read all of that.

On Feb 9, 12:38 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Upanishads are the spiritual gist, the culmination, of Vedanta,
> which again are the core of the Hindu spiritual thought.
>
> You have rightly discerned that attempt to unify people, through
> tempering or moderating their emotional or animal urges, their selfish
> mental inclinations and their sense of power natural to their
> respective strengths or position.
>
> The Upanishads offer the pure, extremely rarefied knowledge for the
> spirit in quest of its own moorings or ' true home,' away from its
> sense of exile or banishment, a recurring thought among Western
> authors and philosophers.
>
> On Feb 9, 9:17 am, 1CellOfMany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have begun listening to a course from "The Teaching Company" called
> > "Religions of the Axial Age:  An Approach to the World’s Religions".
> > The course begins with "the early Indo-European peoples, who migrated
> > [from Central Asia] to West and South Asia and decisively shaped the
> > religious outlook and practices of those regions."  In the second
> > lecture, Dr. Muesse says that, based on what evidence we have about
> > these people, they started out with two classes in the society: The
> > priests, and the rest of the people, whom you could call the
> > producers.  He goes on to describe the roll of the priesthood in that
> > society, the various gods that they worshiped, etc.
>
> > What appears from his description is a society that is governed by the
> > leaders of religion.  These leaders helped to regulate the society
> > morally, helped keep track of the seasons and, through rituals in
> > which the whole community participated, they helped to unify the
> > people.  In other words, in that primitive culture, religion was the
> > civilizing influence, the social force that brought people together
> > and influenced them to work in harmony.
>
> > To proceed from this point, I think that it is important that we make
> > some distinctions (not that we all need reminding, but for added
> > clarity): rather than always speaking of  "religion" in a general way,
> > we should specify when we are specifically referring to a *religious
> > institution* (like a church or a denomination), what I call the
> > "source books" of the religion, specific leaders or interpreters of a
> > religion, and communities that practice the religion.
>
> > On Feb 7, 10:10 pm, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > How many here have read the Upanishads ? !
>
> > > The two most positive aspects of religion are concepts of fraternity
> > > and brotherhood, in times when most of the world were barbarian, on
> > > one hand, and the practice of introspection or self - examination, on
> > > the other.
>
> > > On Feb 8, 2:50 am, 1CellOfMany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > There have been many discussions here where the negative results of
> > > > religion have been brought up as a side issue to another discussion.
> > > > I would like to start two parallel threads here, one about the good
> > > > that religions and religious people have done in and for the world,
> > > > and the other about the bad things that have come from, and been done
> > > > because of religion.
>
> > > > In this thread, lets concentrate on discussing the positive
> > > > contributions of religion. The good acts, the positive results of
> > > > religious teaching, and the positive things that can be learned from
> > > > reading the "source books" of religion, such as the Bible, the
> > > > Upanishads, the Koran, and other writings that are considered "Holy"
> > > > by any religion.
>
> > > > A historical time-line might also be useful, correlating the beginning
> > > > and growth of each religion to historical events and trends in the
> > > > places where the religion was spread.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to