Bernstein's approach at least has some pretensions with regard to investigating the phenomena in accepted scientific manner, even if he sometimes switches statistical categories - frequently not giving results, just significant differences from expected norms. The major problem seems to me to be in the areas of repeatability and dependability.
I am a genuine agnostic in this area. Personally, I have never had any "paranormal" experiences, but I am willing to be convinced. I haven't been yet. I've got to finish this now as my friend, Lyra, is coming around with her alethiometer to help me check out a few things ... :-) Francis On 20 Feb., 17:15, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > Abstract: Intuition is defined for the purposes of this analysis as: > the appearance in the mind of > accurate information about the external world, which can be shown to > have come not through the > five senses, nor through a rearrangement of stored memory contents. > Forms of intuition obeying this > definition have been explored scientifically under such labels as > telepathy, precognition, > presentiment, and remote viewing. This paper summarizes those > scientific findings, and presents a > few theories which have been hypothesized to explain them. Those > theories are largely based in > theoretical physics, including quantum non-locality, holography, and > complex space-time. Related > biological theories are also cited, which propose to explain how > information might move from the > subatomic level up into waking consciousness, for example through DNA > structures or neuronal > microtubules. - PAUL BERNSTEIN, Ph.D. > > http://www.paulbernstein.info/intuition.pdf > > What is your experience with intuition? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
