Nope...just a bunch of stupids on the SC as it is....(belch)

On Feb 22, 2:33 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:54 AM, ornamentalmind
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It has long been said that term limits are for the purview of the
> > voter...each election is another choice...freedom I say.
>
> Yes, this is true.  Ultimately politicians can get voted out.
> However, the longer the seat of power is held the more difficult it is
> to do so.  I shouldn't even have mentioned term limits as that's not
> the issue i was really concerned about.  I don't think we need a super
> star on the SC.  I'd bet the farm we won't get it either.  We ain't
> that stupid yet.
>
> dj
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 22, 3:50 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I actualy have no problems with this concept.  I think of it this way.
>
> >> No matter what we think of any politician they are, like the rest of
> >> us, merely performing within the remit of their employment.  With any
> >> worker the idea is not remain at the same level for the course of your
> >> working life, but to move on upwards.  Would you have similar problems
> >> with the tire fitter moving sideways and upwards to car mechanice?
>
> >> On 21 Feb, 22:24, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Sheesh.  With comments like these from my European friends it
> >> > perplexes me how us Americans are accused of "swollen head syndrome."
> >> > Must be our superior athletic abilities...
>
> >> > The main issue with me is having a cult of personality like a head of
> >> > state remain in an important and pivotal political role after his term
> >> > is over.  It allows for him/her to garner too much power.  The balance
> >> > is upset.  I believe this is true no matter who the leader is.  Even a
> >> > paragon such as Ronald Reagan.  They should go into the job with the
> >> > knowledge they have a maximum of 8 years to get things done.  After
> >> > that it's time to play golf and write your memoirs and build houses
> >> > for poor people and raise money for charity/disaster victims.  Stay
> >> > out of politics.
>
> >> > dj
>
> >> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, frantheman 
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > One could add that those democracies which use a more sophisticated
> >> > > mixture of legislative/executive structures. with the practical, day-
> >> > > to-day executive elected by and responsible to parliament, don't seem
> >> > > to need term limits. Governments are elected by parliament and, should
> >> > > they lose their majorities (either through the collapse of coalitions
> >> > > or, more usually, as a result of general elections) are replaced by
> >> > > them. Prime Ministers lose their positions, go into opposition, and
> >> > > are occasionally even reelected some years later. It's only in the
> >> > > rarer, more primitive forms of republics, based on an eighteenth
> >> > > century model which simply replaces a monarchial executive with a
> >> > > presidential one (e.g. USA, France and Russia), that the concept of
> >> > > term limits is even seems to be necessary.
>
> >> > > Francis
>
> >> > > On 21 Feb., 22:11, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > >> Don,
>
> >> > >> There's no limit on terms here in the UK. However, as the current 
> >> > >> Labour
> >> > >> government has found out (lead by Blair or Brown), if you're in power 
> >> > >> for
> >> > >> much more than a decade you end up rewriting your own policies and the
> >> > >> population falls out of love with you. Obama on the Supreme Court 
> >> > >> sounds
> >> > >> like a good idea -- he'll probably be be able to say awake during 
> >> > >> events and
> >> > >> meetings, unlike some of the geriatrics serving there now.
>
> >> > >> Right now America could probably do with abandoning democracy 
> >> > >> altogether and
> >> > >> coming back under British rule. It'll be for your own good. We're 
> >> > >> living in
> >> > >> a time where, because of your clumsy foreign policies, more people are
> >> > >> offended by the American flag than the flag of Nazi Germany. We'll 
> >> > >> show you
> >> > >> how to do it properly without drawing too much attention to yourself 
> >> > >> -- just
> >> > >> like we're doing with our theft of the Argentinian's oil. It'll do 
> >> > >> you good,
> >> > >> rolling with the pros.
>
> >> > >> Ian
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > > [email protected].
> >> > > For more options, visit this group 
> >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to