Oh, and the issue of infinite divisibility… perhaps ripe for a new topic? Or would it be appropriate here? I know I’ve approached this analysis a few times here at ME and so far find it sound. Of course on one level, not having completed the science (most likely an impossibility), “we” do not know as you point out Slip. Yet on other levels including thought experiments and analysis, it most assuredly points to the nature of reality.
On Feb 27, 6:08 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > It was interesting but not sure it adds to or lends any credibility to > Buddism. Its just another view I guess. Not sure about everything > being infinitely divisible. I'd visit Tibet but my lungs won't go. > > On Feb 27, 12:59 am, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Robert Thurman > > > Topics include: > > The Growing popularity of Atheism > > Buddhism’s Stance on Deism > > Buddhism and the Meaning of Life > > Hyperrealism in Buddhism > > Backstage interview > > Obama and the History of Christianity in America > > The Chinese Occupation of Tibet > > Why the Dalai Lama Matters > > The Source of the Dalai Lama’s Popularity > > > Many points here…most are quite interesting. What do you think? > > >http://fora.tv/2009/02/09/Robert_Thurman_at_City_Arts__Lectures > > > I studied w/Bob back in the mid 80s.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
