Pressure exerted anywhere in confined fluid is trasmitted equally in (in all directions) through out the fluid. <P=pg(Ah) The symbol should be upright.....
Bloomfield,Louis(2006) How things work. The Physics of everday life John & Sons (Thrid edition) pp 153 ISBNO47146886X dj On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Only the second and third are really worth considering. > > Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. > > This is not nesiarily logicaly consistant. > > Forgive me for getting Star Trechie on ya but I was watching a few > weeks back an episode of Voyger where Captian Janeway and the hologram > of Leonardo DeVinci are trapped on a planet, and the hologram is > having trouble understanding all the techy things that Janeway can do. > > She asks him to consider that if he was a Sparrow what would he know > of the fine arts of humanity. The reply was along the lines of even > if a great master spent years explaining it to me, the limits of my > mind still would not be able to comprehend. > > If we posit the existance of a creative God then the very first > consideration should be that such a being is greater than ourselves. > So to attribute the human label of malevolent to such a being is not > logicaly sound. > > Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh Evil? > > Evil comes from the acts of humanity. Can we call an earthquake evil? > > > > > On 9 Mar, 05:48, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm going to address a few issues when I can, life has taken most of > > my attention recently. I will post on the idiots idea of Pascal's > > wager and all of the silly ideas that it invokes, I simply don't have > > the time at the moment. > > Until then, I'd like you to chew on this quote. Devout theists > > proclaim this to be a defeated concept, without ever explaining when, > > where, or how it was defeated. Christians especially call foul, yet > > seem incapable of explaining the foul. An extreme case of irony > > happens more often than many of you might imagine; wherein a bible > > believer declares this to be an out of date writing by an ancient > > author, one that has no bearing on modern life!!!! hahahaha too funny > > and so sad... > > > > Is God willing to prevent Evil, but not able? Then he is not > > omnipotent. > > Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. > > Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh Evil? > > Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God? > > - Epicurus- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
