I've been on gravity for a couple of weeks now and there's a lot about
it I find good, some things that annoy me (although, as it's still
beta, I think feedback has a good chance of getting some of these
fixed).

I like the rich media environment and the plethora of other worlds
being created. I often find myself logging on to gravity to see what's
going on on ME there and then getting involved in other stuff too.

I don't see it as replacing the forum here - what I like about the
original ME is that the format lends itself to ... how should I put
this? ... more intense, dedicated discussion on some topics. There's
more of an atmosphere of community, in a strange sort of way, here.

One of the main advantages of the ME world on gravity is involving new
people in our discussions, ME is like a vampire in this regard, it
needs constant infusions of new blood :-)

How about a more prominent link from ME on gravity back to here,
Chris, for newbies there who might be interested?

Francis

On 26 Mrz., 17:11, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I'm digging it, and we're finding new blood in there as well. Glad to
> know you're still alive! ;D
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Kierkecraig <[email protected]
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Chris,
> > I see, Gabby emailed me and I interpreted from what she said as the
> > group was moving.  I've joined the Gravity group now.  I can see why
> > you started a group there, it seems to be quite user friendly.
> > Craig
>
> > On Mar 26, 6:11 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I don't know...what's this about it "moving"? :)
>
> > > There's no moving. I think many of the traditionalists, myself included,
> > > will always like the convenience of an email list. I just formed a ME
> > group
> > > on Gravity so that we had a place for more three dimensional, rich media
> > > friendly conversations. It seems to be working out pretty well.
>
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Kierkecraig <
> > [email protected]
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > So what's this about ME moving to "Gravity"?  What in the world is
> > > > "Gravity"?
> > > > Kierkecraig
>
> > > > On Mar 22, 11:17 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > What is the 6.5 measuring? Is that a 10 scale as a website? As a
> > > > > conversational tool?
>
> > > > > Here are my thoughts:
>
> > > > > 1. The conversations there are much more rich media friendly. I can
> > embed
> > > > > images, links, videos, etc, right into the page, making it more
> > likely to
> > > > be
> > > > > seen.
>
> > > > > 2. The conversations are three dimensional - a "Reply" can be fully
> > > > fleshed
> > > > > out as a separate thread using the comments below it, while not
> > > > interrupting
> > > > > the stream of the original topic.
>
> > > > > 3. The influx of people being driven by Gravity's marketing efforts
> > means
> > > > > that our conversations get to a wider audience.
>
> > > > > As I've previously stated, I don't think Gravity will ever be a
> > > > replacement
> > > > > for the ME list, short of Google shutting down the service. I think
> > it's
> > > > a
> > > > > fantastic augmentation, however.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Ulysses here, wondering what any of you think about the new
> > > > > > Gravity.com arena.
>
> > > > > > Here are some of my thoughts.  A plus is the ability to explore
> > other
> > > > > > conversations while partaking in a few of your own.  In comparison
> > > > > > with ME there are thousands more participants so one can move out
> > of a
> > > > > > room into another without have to log into a new place and change
> > > > > > parties.  However, I found that most replies don't get answers
> > right
> > > > > > away and some don't get any.  One can easily get too spread out in
> > > > > > there and forget where they were. I'd rather just be able to Tag
> > the
> > > > > > conversations I took part in.  It seems I could spend 20 minutes
> > just
> > > > > > retracing my steps.
>
> > > > > > The Orbiting feature I find cumbersome, in that after logging on
> > there
> > > > > > are too many little tidbits of what everyone had to say and do,
> > just
> > > > > > too much needless information.  I don't feel I need to be informed
> > > > > > that someone simply liked a reply.  In fact I had to stop orbiting
> > a
> > > > > > couple of people because they post so much that I had to scroll
> > down
> > > > > > near 30 bits to get to the next.  So that part of getting back to
> > > > > > conversations is time consuming.  A big minus for me there is that
> > > > > > even knowing that someone replied to a reply does not necessarily
> > mean
> > > > > > that you will find it at the end of the conversation because they
> > can
> > > > > > reply midway any time.  That means that I have to scan the entire
> > > > > > conversation to find the reply, which could take some time if the
> > > > > > conversation is lengthy.
>
> > > > > > The whole badge thing is like stroking people along with little
> > perks,
> > > > > > I guess to keep the ego soothed but I found them kinda silly.  I
> > think
> > > > > > there is a generation that is finding it a great place.
>
> > > > > > I did enjoy being able to attach a face to the name feature and I'm
> > > > > > wondering how many are using out dated photos. hehe  Mine is a few
> > > > > > years old but I really haven't changed any since then, except for
> > > > > > looking a bit younger now. lol
>
> > > > > > I came across this piece which explains what the execs had in mind
> > > > > > when they started up this project.
>
> >http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/16/exclusive-ex-myspace-execs-launch-gr.
> > > > ..
>
> > > > > > Well overall I think it isn't a bad place and it is an alternative
> > > > > > when this place is dead and it is a chance to meet new people.
>
> > > > > > I'll give it a 6.5  What are your thoughts?
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups
> > > > > >  .com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups
> > > >  .com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups 
> > .com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to