wait, !!!WHAT!!! ? On Apr 2, 2:31 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > I will try to better myself. Good to see you back here, Molly! Hope > everything is alright with you. > > On 2 Apr., 15:58, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think what is termed an evolving mind is simply one that gains > > awareness, that realizes more possibility in a life of infinite > > possibility. Dialogue can certainly lead us there. The ability to > > communicate in archetypical symbols does indeed require expanded > > awareness, as the shared understanding between two or more in the > > presence of the symbol would need to somehow be communicated. > > > On Apr 2, 8:55 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "Toward the evolution of the future mind, beyond > > > religion and tribalism, where the need to be pacified is outgrown > > > into > > > stages of actualization and creation. (?)" > > > > Nice sentiment Ash! I guess the question is if that is possible? Well > > > of course it is! However I do not agree that the individual's state is > > > to compete in order to gain identity. This may depend upon the > > > individual but certainly this is not a mind which is evolving. The > > > reason I say this (I hope this is not out of context) is that an > > > evolved mind needs not to compete but rather be generative. Rather > > > than discourse, a sure course using subtle and implicit symbols > > > without making offense. > > > > On Apr 1, 9:45 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "The URL contained a malformed video ID. " > > > > > On Apr 1, 7:30 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I think that pointlessness is the point........WHAT.............. > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McT58kjWN > > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:53 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Mar, 16:11, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Greetings.. fellow eyers.. now.. i dont have much to offer rite > > > > > > > now.. > > > > > > > but only require some help.. haunted by this strange > > > > > > > emptiness..and a > > > > > > > feeling of void.. without any reason.. it brings me again and > > > > > > > again to > > > > > > > the initial post i posted at mind's...the pointlessness of > > > > > > > everything.. and the absurdity behind every action.. when the > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > from a different level..the endless justifications.. a never > > > > > > > ending > > > > > > > chain..where justification for something is found in something > > > > > > > outside > > > > > > > the thing...and justification for that outside it.. it never > > > > > > > ends... > > > > > > > though it is not very articulately put...i hope i make my point > > > > > > > clear....it somehow makes one think of suicide... (no i am not > > > > > > > contemplating it)..;-) > > > > > > > Whilst the point of any given thing may not be obvious, there is, > > > > > > most > > > > > > certainly, a point to everything. There is a subtle implication in > > > > > > the concept of the space-time continuum that in order to get from > > > > > > point A (where we are at any given moment) to point B (the next step > > > > > > after point A), we must, in fact, make a move. The fact that space > > > > > > and time are joined and there is a single entity, the continuum, > > > > > > that > > > > > > contains ALL of space and time is vastly important to your answer. > > > > > > The problem with giving a specific answer, though, is the fact that > > > > > > none of us know what 'the end result' is. Whilst it's completely > > > > > > true > > > > > > to state that the future already exists, we don't know what it is > > > > > > and > > > > > > have no access to it, so we can only speculate. Yet our ability to > > > > > > speculate is, invariably, short-sighted, as we lack omniscience and > > > > > > don't even see all the possibilities. So, whilst it may SEEM to be > > > > > > pointless at any given time, that is, most likely, down to the fact > > > > > > that the observer/speclator doesn't know where the universe is > > > > > > headed. > > > > > > > If we knew what the 'end game' was, we might be able to more clearly > > > > > > infer 'the point' of any given situation and how it may relate to > > > > > > that > > > > > > 'end game'; but, our inability to know the future prevents us from > > > > > > seeing clearly what the purpose of 'now' is and our lack of > > > > > > omniscience stands in the way of a full speculation on what may be > > > > > > possible. > > > > > > Hopefully, you'll get from this response is that we can know, with > > > > > > certainty (because of the fact of a space-time continuum) that there > > > > > > is a point to whatever it is that we are doing, as it is part of the > > > > > > process that takes us from point A to point B, but we are hindered > > > > > > in, > > > > > > at least, a couple of ways from seeing/understanding clearly and, > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > afraid, that simply part of the challenge of life. > > > > > > > Hope this helps clarify why 'the point' may 'seem' pointless' but, > > > > > > rest assured, if something has happened (or is happening), then it > > > > > > is > > > > > > a hard fact that it was (or is) necessary, as there are no > > > > > > unnecessary > > > > > > events in the space-time continuum. And that is a direct > > > > > > philosophical implication of Special Relativity- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
