On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds like an Orea Cookie and a Krispy Creme Donut.
>
> I'll have to think on it for a spell.
>
> Later
>

Are we back to doughnut theory?  I thought rexeaglenet exhausted this one.

dj


> On Apr 16, 10:44 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >      I was thinking about quasars this week and what they might be and
> > stumbled across something interesting that I thought I might share
> > with you.  Firstly, my thought was that a quasar might just be a black
> > hole with a white hole at the centre.  Probably NOT a new thought, but
> > it led me to work out what a white hole MIGHT be.  I thought that,
> > perhaps, a white hole is an area of space that is completely filled.
> > But how could that happen?  Well, if the pressures inside the black
> > hole are strong enough to compress the energy inside to the smallest
> > wavelength possible, that of the Planck length, then THAT would
> > completely fill that area of space-time with tiny, but incredibly
> > powerful photons.
> >      SO, here’s some of the maths:  Start with the speed of light:
> > 299,792,458 metres per second.  Now, divide that number by the Planck
> > length of 1.616252^-35.  That comes out to a frequency of 1.8548621^
> > +49 Hz.  ()  Now, assuming that area is a bog-standard “black body”,
> > it would produce a temperature of 5.3749609522385^+39 degrees Kelvin.
> > And THAT, my friends, is, technically, the hottest temperature
> > allowable in this universe and, thus, the opposite end of the Kelvin
> > scale.  Well, at least the highest temperature one could expect to
> > find in THIS universe.
> >      So, if a white hole, as described above, were to exist inside a
> > super-massive black hole, when any matter from the black hole’s
> > accretion disc fell into the black hole, it would approach the white
> > hole and get thrown out at right angles (i.e., the matter would spew
> > from the poles, as black holes are spinning) and THAT seems to fit the
> > observations we see of what quasars do.  Any thoughts, anyone?
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to