By emphasising on the result ... ' make a difference ' ... ' effect the world ' ... we perhaps are taking the meaning away from our self.
Peace is ( in ) my nature. Therefore, I choose peace always. Any campaign that brings people in touch with this simple realisation would be great, no matter the size of its reach or spread. And there are numerous campaigns at work the world over. I believe most people, and definitely most women, are already there. It is the deprivations, frustrations and alienations ... much natural, much much man made ... that twist and distort us out of our ( substratum ) nature. That's where campaigns could help. The change should be hitting at institutionalised greed, apathy and violence. For instance, so long as it is legal ( and right ) for me to have my feast while others die of hunger ... till then collective peace would remain breached and divided. On May 14, 8:18 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > This organization, Peace One Day, is based on the premise that each of > us can make a difference by working in concert. Much like Howard > Zinn's message that social efficacy depends on organization in one > voice, Peace One Day encourages each of us to take a stand for peace > in our lifetime. Can we really make a difference? Do the actions of > one person effect the world? > > On Apr 14, 12:45 pm, Diego <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think that each person is able to make a difference with the fact of > > believe and do things to reach its own goals. > > > The people whose do every things well. > > > The people whose is concentrated to success can make difference. > > > The problem is if the difference is done because of bad actions.
