In response to your question,archytas, here is a direct quote from the article: "Ultimately, the transformation required to shift towards sustainable consumption and production will entail no less than an organic change in the structure of society itself so as to reflect fully the interdependence of the entire social body—as well as the interconnectedness with the natural world that sustains it. Among these changes, many of which are already the focus of considerable public discourse, are: the consciousness of world citizenship; the eventual federation of all nations through an integrated system of governance with capacity for global decision-making; the establishment of structures which recognize humanity’s common ownership of the earth’s resources; the establishment of full equality between men and women; the elimination of all forms of prejudice; the establishment of a universal currency and other integrating mechanisms that promote global economic justice; the adoption of an international auxiliary language to facilitate mutual understanding; and the redirection of massive military expenditures towards constructive social ends[iv]."
On May 21, 9:19 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > The majority seem scared of anything like this Onecell. Peoples like > the Amish still live under wider protection, and the B'hai are > persecuted in Iran. How do we protect our sustainable communities > from bandits and mad, violent religionists? > > On 21 May, 21:48, 1CellOfMany <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here is a different perspective on Prosperity. The article below was > > copied from the Baha'i News Service:http://news.bahai.org/story/770 > > > A new statement challenging the common assumption that human beings > > are slaves to self-interest and consumerism has been issued by the > > Baha'i International Community. > > > A more profound look at human nature would reveal the ability to > > respond to a higher calling, suggests the document – issued this week > > for the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development as it > > began its annual two-week session. > > > "The culture of consumerism ... has tended to reduce human beings to > > competitive, insatiable consumers of goods and to objects of > > manipulation by the market," it says. > > > In fact, "the human experience is essentially spiritual in nature: it > > is rooted in the inner reality – or what some call the 'soul' – that > > we all share in common," it states. > > > The document, titled "Rethinking Prosperity: Forging Alternatives to a > > Culture of Consumerism," challenges the view that there is an > > intractable conflict between what people want – which supposedly is to > > consume more – and what humanity needs. > > > "Much of economic and psychological theory depicts human beings as > > slaves to self-interest," it says. "The faculties needed to construct > > a more just and sustainable social order – moderation, justice, love, > > reason, sacrifice and service to the common good – have too often been > > dismissed as naive ideals. Yet, it is these and related qualities that > > must be harnessed. ..." > > > Peter Adriance, a member of the Baha'i International Community's > > delegation to the Commission, said the statement is a contribution to > > a dialogue on the development of a 10-year framework to encourage new > > programs that advance sustainable consumption and production. > > > "The document deals with the issue of consumerism by reflecting on the > > question of what is human nature," he said. "We must look at who we > > are and what our purpose in life is. > > > "The transition to sustainable consumption and production is one of > > the great challenges of our times, and to achieve it will require a > > transformation in both thought and action. The cultural forces at play > > are powerful and demand re-examination if we are to move forward," he > > said. > > > The statement can be read > > athttp://bic.org/statements-and-reports/bic-statements/10-0503.htm.
