i dont see how any decent individal couldnt want that ~ yet there is no movement twards it ~
[email protected] wrote: > Bryan I'm with you 100% on this one. > > Much of the worlds ills can be put down to simple love of money. Take > away the money, find a better way, I'm all for that. > > > On Mar 29, 7:28 pm, Bryan Oboczky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why should there b welth at all ? No welth no control +equality > > why does it have to be about my finantal situation. What about the > > people rationing water and food . People u never met ~nor have i ~... > > Lazarus... And once again the exact stats of welth dont matter/the > > point is the same~so yes i hold responsible the rich and system of $ > > in general > > > > On 3/29/11, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It is not necessarily unimportant, last time I played cards for money > > > (over > > > 32 years ago) I sat at a black jack table and started with $80 and when I > > > quit I had over $28,000.oo in chips in my pocket.. in the game the put in > > > two shill dealers against me. I lost my job as a dealer over it, also > > > decided it was immoral. So I quit gambling.. point is you never know who > > > you are playing against. > > > > > If you want a redistribution of wealth then it requires a wise plan and > > > massive amounts of knowledge. It is possible but to do it you would need > > > to > > > totally stay away from drugs.. and then understand your beliefs and then > > > how > > > create a church to keep the wealth from evaporating or ending up in > > > an individuals hands.. You will need to understand funds and economic > > > development.. as well as keeping it working for all the people. It is a > > > tricky path to walk. but possible .. lol one step at a time. > > > Allan > > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, the taoist shaman > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> i know its not realistic , u being better at cards than me is beside > > >> the point , its not 500 to 50 its 1 holding 98 to 99 holding 2 , if u > > >> think thats a fair playing feild and that were not going to end up > > >> slaves to the rich?! so what ,its adog eat dog world and thats that?! > > >> FTS! and how many people would prefer poverty and gov. control over > > >> freedom and prosparety ! the rich and the politician , but soon the > > >> politician will be the only one to hold wleth, capitalism is coming > > >> to an end , if one person or group holds all $ there is no money only > > >> compleate control, but this would cause revolution , so u throw a bone > > >> for the dog to chew and keep him bussy and happy , dosile, r u a dog , > > >> am I ! > > > > >> [email protected] wrote: > > >> > Your card game anology does not take into account the skill of the > > >> > players. > > > > >> > I'm in fact a very good card player and I recon if you start with $500 > > >> > and I $50 then there is a slightly less than even chance I'll take all > > >> > of your money. > > > > >> > On Mar 29, 1:38 pm, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > organized world wide revelution, this conversation is proof of fast > > >> > > easy communication , if evryone picks up a gun at the same time, to > > >> > > rebell against all gov..... . . . there would or course , > > >> > > afterwards , need to be NON PROFIT organizations set up by the > > >> > > people for transportation and equal distrabution of goods - evryone > > >> > > pulls weight- if u want to go to school to be a doctor u reward is > > >> > > pride and doing good for others- the greedy selfseeking people of the > > >> > > world who diminish the quality of life for litteraly billions of > > >> > > others - would have nothing to leech off > > > > >> > > if we play a game of cards and i start withh 500$ to evryone elses > > >> > > 50$ > > >> > > - and i dont take every last bit of $ from evryone else > > >> > > - .... . . . well , i would have to be stupid - or evryone else > > >> > > would have to quit the game befor i took everything thay had - and if > > >> > > they didnt , they would have to be stupid. > > > > >> > > i think its time we quit the game > > > > >> > > [email protected] wrote: > > >> > > > What do you propose? > > > > >> > > > On Mar 28, 12:03 am, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > 98% of the worlds welth is held by 1% of the population ......... > > >> even > > >> > > > > gov. that isnt capitalist is subjected to capitalism ...... the > > >> entire > > >> > > > > world is...... what happens when 100% is held by 1% , how do we > > >> > > > > all > > >> > > > > accept this, because thats the way it is? are we a colony of > > >> > > > > ants > > >> > > > > working for our queen because we are told to?....... are we so > > >> simple > > >> > > > > as a species the we will accept what situation were given untill > > >> > > > > it > > >> > > > > gets so bad that we have to fight > > > > >> > > > > if theres a storm on the horizon do u wate for it to come before > > >> > > > > taking shelter ?- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > ( > > > ) > > > I_D Allan > > > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
