Yes I think it involves much of what the problem solvers among us have 
always done, and am leaning toward an organismic analog/model. As I see it 
this undertaking can happen by accident and probably take a very long time 
to gather momentum or it can be an intentional more direct redefinition of 
human capital and collective human outputs. I agree with informed consent, 
if someone has an idea for increasing the yield of agriculture by recycling 
wastes that are expensive to dispose of it just makes sense to ask how to do 
it, with due diligence, and it makes sense to have public policy that 
facilitates the common good. So the first thing is identifying common 
languages, facilitating the dispersal of effective and productive systems, 
and it grows in all directions. But the strength of this effort would need a 
universal framework and a starter template to get people on board 
contributing their intellectual/cultural/visionary capital.

And I am highly protective of making a project without antibodys in place. 
It would be very destructive to put your dream out there and see it get used 
to create more human suffering or to prolong and strengthen negative 
qualities of society. It is obvious to me that humanity needs something 
other than a banner to hide under or flag to wave, that is the opposite of 
my visualization, antigenic in organic terms. There are many questions 
involved like how to facilitate great strides in many social systems and 
having things in place for structure while also promoting the cream to the 
top so to speak, and while allowing diverse cultural interpretation. So the 
wealth of knowledge and experience becomes a collective pool, it just makes 
sense to learn from and interact with, and to give something back.  There is 
a lot more to it than this, like having projects that pursue the common 
interests of humanity and collective vision available but it is more 
particular and still sounds a bit 'fringe'. But really, I'd like us to 
redefine all the outputs and inputs to the human equation mostly using 
general scientific knowledge for what has good results and to consider 
beginning work on future/disesaster proofing humanity. Just a few high prize 
topics: population, education, nanotechnology, resource consumption, laying 
waste to the Earth, space exploration/colonization, solar energy processing, 
extraterrestrial transport, moving industrial processes into space. Inspire 
people, give them work, something to invest in, it mostly doesn't sound like 
novel concepts. But that 'key' is mostly out there, I think a hard part will 
be putting it to work, which requires getting people's attention, and 
keeping it. If we could facilitate the types of interaction that tie the 
system together, everybody does the work. Considering the problems in the 
world today, there should be ZERO unemployment. Every branch quickly 
disperses into a large interactivity jumble, so a larger picture is 
important. Some of the framework is getting coherent for me.

Reply via email to