Allan, Here's an excerpt from PES(Pure Energy Systems)Wiki; We believe that local Renewable Energy Contractors are a pragmatic and innovative group of engineers, who will find a single FE/OU powered test house to be sufficiently persuasive to begin testing, using, selling, and installing the GVEP themselves in their local communities. Each working home power installation will then attract its own converts, as friends and neighbors of "early-adopters" also opt to become energy independent. Due to the electrical and mechanical simplicity of the unit, no significant investment is needed in fabrication or assembly to begin producing such systems. With no big factory, precision machine tooling, specialized manufacturing equipment, or venture capital necessary, and no issues as to intellectual property rights, the GVEP can be productized by dozens of independent small business startup ventures around the world simultaneously, and bootstrapped by each of them into substantial sales volumes.
Working hardware, locally demonstrated and available for immediate purchase and installation, trumps any skepticism that fundamentalist scientific dogma can throw at it. The fulcrum that gives a mainstream establishment leverage to intercept and block successful FE/OU technology has been - virtually always and everywhere - the point at which the Inventor Turns Entrepreneur. First, there are psycho-social factors common to talented research inventors, which reciprocally make them unlikely "people persons" to organize and lead venture teams (i.e. "they don't play well with others"). Invariably, Inventor ego, paranoia, greed, suspicion, and poor socialization/communications skills, or bad judgment (or bad luck) in finding/selecting potential partners and team members, inhibits successful commercialization of the completed technology. Second, however, when the development stage technology venture turns to venture capitalists and investment bankers to underwrite productization and manufacturing, these institutional investors always must obtain independent technical evaluations from respected mainstream academic university research professors. They must, for reasons of legal liability, conduct this "Due Diligence" investigation, soliciting the opinions of independent scientific sources. Of course, for reasons obvious, establishment scientists will - always and everywhere - fail to endorse FE/OU technology concepts, thus dissuading the venture capitalist or investment banker from backing the inventor's technology, product, and venture. The GVEP, requiring no such financial underwriting, and having no one aberrant inventor, can easily sidestep these impediments, sliding into the marketplace where no opposition can effectively prevent it. I recommend to all who are interested in/concerned about our enegy needs, to thoroughly explore this site! On Apr 1, 1:45 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > no one has been rude to youo ,,, but right now I think you are going into > the realm of poor taste. > Allan > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:39 PM, the taoist shaman <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > im sorry im just a LITTLE BIT bi pollar, get frustrated easy , at the > > same time u can make a point without being rude , but still im sorry > > > i told this dude the other day that im bi pollar , he thought i liked > > dressing up as a big white bear and having sex with bolth men and > > wommen, started coming on to me, ....... it was ocward > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > Heheh taoist, I'm a smart arse and a synic, shoud I be stommped out? > > > Or are we reserving this for those who show the full compliment of > > > atributes? > > > > On Mar 31, 3:54 pm, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > why arnt we useing or at least puting into reserch teslas ideas , no > > > > one would make $ ? > > > > > allin there is a vast amount of untaped energy in the wind . > > > > uuuuhhhhhhhhh i think smart ass , synical , self glorifying people , > > > > need to be stomped out , and exposed as the filth that they are. oh > > > > but thats right we alredy made big fans , w-A D MF er , not u > > > > allin, ........... oh god im giving in to the ways of the simple > > > > minded that i rebuke arnt i !? damn oh well , EACH OF US ARE HUMAN > > > > RIGHT! > > > > > DarkwaterBlight wrote: > > > > > Edison's rival was Nikola Tesla and in the late 1800's he was even > > > > > more famous than Edison. He is credited for inventing the modern > > radio > > > > > and the Tesla coil which is still used in radios and t.v.'s today. > > > > > Many of his inventions were lost to the public as the patents were > > > > > bought out. John Bedini took one of Tesla's inventions (Tesla switch) > > > > > and invented a generator that is essentialy a "free energy device". > > He > > > > > presented this device at the Tesla Centennial Symposium in Colorado > > > > > Springs, CO, on August, 11, 1984 > > > > > > On Mar 30, 3:48 pm, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > this is an exelant topic, i forget his name (eddisons rival in > > power > > > > > > supply) he mimmicked the great pyramid , even built his proto typ > > on > > > > > > an aquifer, i know it sounds crazy , but only because we have been > > > > > > taught to belive its crazy, i dont have the brain to get into > > detail , > > > > > > the only reason eddison won because his rival , ?fudechie? wanted > > to > > > > > > supply power for free, edison to profit, so it comes back to this, > > $ > > > > > > > our attempt at alternative energy is sad, were still going to space > > on > > > > > > rockets! WTF! E=Mc2 energy = mass x the speed of light squared! if > > we > > > > > > cant make that safe weve blundered a gift from nature > > > > > > > if we could find a way to make anti matter affordably we could > > create > > > > > > enough energy to make oil look as powerfull as horshack on > > morphine , > > > > > > welcom back cotter, good song for that show > > > > > > > i dont know much about this but look forward to hearing others > > > > > > > greetings matt, nice to meet u > > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2:20 pm, Matthijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > So with the recent developments in Japan, governments consider > > closing > > > > > > > nuclear power plants. So I was wondering what is the future > > concerning > > > > > > > our power needs?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > ( > ) > I_D Allan > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
