I am fine, too. [?][?] On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:12 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am fine gabby, how about you ? > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:52 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > The old I am that I am matter. You might get a fresh look if you start > > reading it as: 1 am that 1 am. And maybe you'll find that there is a 1,1 > and > > a 1,2 and a 1,3 and a 1,4 and even more till it adds up to the 1 duality > as > > outlined above. Or maybe you'll want to go beyond the oneness of the > duality > > and discover the three and four. Whatever. Or make it new expressions. - > > Nah, that's boring also. How are you today, RP? > > > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> In duality there is the relationship of the observer and the observed > >> , the knower and the known , that is , there are two. In Non-Duality > >> there is only One and the world which is dualistic in nature , remains > >> what it is , just an illusion - i.e. subject to birth and death. God > >> ,Reality or Atman is Non-Dual and duality is just its expression. > > > > >
<<800.gif>>
<<360.gif>>
