Yeah, I was fear mongering Chuck, a political device. ;-) This is a favorite topic of mine, it is at the axis of many fields. To accelerate nanotech development I think we should implement rapid prototyping, experimentation and analysis systems. When I envision man at the beginning of this revolution I look for tools that would allow an explosion (figuratively) of development, being able to catalog and operate a multitude of experiments in parallel, while building a massive library of modeled behavior for materials and systems interoperating in the real world to improve the robustness and diversity of this technology is apparently the way to go. To think that the behavior of biological systems can be abstracted and used to formulate dynamic systems guided by expert algorithms to solve material challenges in real time guided by people over vast distances, it goes beyond genetics, I am in awe at the potential universe we are venturing toward. We will also be able to make changes to ourselves and our experience of this world at a similar rate..

On 5/19/2011 1:41 AM, Chuck Bowling wrote:
I think that with nanotechnology we will be able to synthesize pretty much anything we want from raw materials in the future. Assuming that any alien race capable of traveling the trillions of miles to get here would have at least the same level of technology my guess is that they wouldn't need anything we'd have to offer.

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Ash <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    There is another good reason to develop our technologies as a
    species, think how we are looking at the planets and celestial
    bodies as vast resources. Imagine if something else came through
    and strip mined the resources we would need to develop into a
    spacefaring species, that would suck big time. Like a tribe of
    humans moving through and picking all the nuts we squirrels need,
    or worse, deciding we were in the way of those resources, think
    what we have done in those situations.. I know it's unlikely
    considering the vast resources out there, but something might have
    it's eye on our pale blue dot too, working faster than us at
    making the leap.


    On 5/18/2011 8:37 PM, Chuck Bowling wrote:
    I think right now the technology will only allow us to tell if a
    planet is rocky or a gas giant. And even then only if it is a
    relatively massive planet. The last time I read anything on the
    subject the smallest planet found was something like 3 times the
    size of the Earth.

    IMO, the analogy with Columbus doesn't hold. 17th century
    technology allowed humans to travel anywhere on the Earth -
    albeit slow and wrought with hazard. If the analogy is that a
    neighboring star is like a new continent then we are more like
    cavemen discovering that a log can float. At the rate we're going
    it might be a thousand years before we can actually mount an
    expedition to another star.

    I think the primary reason we are so far from actually exploring
    other stars is mainly political rather than technological. But, I
    think you are right. It is a project worth attaching too. Now if
    we could just make the damn politicians see it that way... ;)

    On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:58 PM, archytas <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I'm not sure how accurate they can be in revealing planets
        enough like
        ours to offer possibilities of a new promised land.  They
        claim there
        is one 20 light years away, or 300,000 years at current space
        travel
        speeds.  One can feel that this at least puts us somewhere
        near the
        position of 'Columbus'.  Our current 'tin-foil' technology
        won't do,
        but at this kind of distance we are talking about something
        other than
        worm-holes, 'relativity flight' or the kind of physics in which
        distance is an illusion.

        For someone like me who can't take god-stories seriously and
        quite
        likes the idea of a human future (or at least the idea of
        evolution
        not just ending through catastrophe), there is an opportunity to
        believe in something distant in time and a need for us to direct
        ourselves towards it.  A time, perhaps in which a form of
        conscious
        life can live very differently from now, and a project worth
        attaching
        to - perhaps a reason for spirituality.  Comments on this or the
        technology welcome.





Reply via email to