On Apr 30, 8:24 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > um....i dont think i should be posting this here but i think there are > some science whiz kids on the group.... so would mind explaining to me > the whole deal behind antimatter....and its implications....i just > dont seem to get it....
The difference between mater and antimatter is charge. The antimatter electron is a positron, it has the same mass and spin as an electron but it has a positive charge rather than the usual negative charge of an electron. The reason why both matter and antimatter exist is that there exists symmetry in existence. Energy forms in what are, essentially, chiral forms, that is, left-handed and right-handed and you need both. Antimatter, having opposite charge, attracts matter and thus is, in my theory, the driving force behind the expansion of our space. Our space is expanding at the rate of the Hubble Constant and it must be expanding THROUGH a medium and that medium automatically implies there is a radial dimension to our space-time through which our space is expanding. If the antimatter were removed from the early universe--as it was--and set up at the boundary of the medium through which space expands, it would exert a magnetic pull on the matter in our space-time continuum and, therefore, act as the driving force that drives the expansion of space by exerting a magnetic pull on the matter and literally pulling it from the past into the future. Of course, when the two coolide, it all anihilates back to pure light and the process stars again (given a hyperbolic shape to the medium through which we are expanding, that is!).
