I agree, the more open may solve the bottleneck problem, but it won't dissolute the jarredness.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote: > More open than whose thoughts? Without knowing, yes, more open than > some…and not than others. > > From what little I’ve read of hers, she does appear to be a valuable > gadfly. Iconoclasm has its place; however, in and of itself is not > actual openess. > > > On Aug 15, 8:28 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Any major kind of philosophising always presents some distinctive > > ideal for life as well as for thought because life and thought are not > > really separate at all, and if the contemporary academic philosophers > > suppose they are not doing this they are mistaken. Academic narrowness > > is a style of thought as much as any other. It is quite as easily > > conveyed by a style of writing, and even more easily by a style of > > teaching." ~ Mary Midgely, who produced her first philosophical work > > at the age of 56 ! > > > > Biographical profile @http://bit.ly/mXcrdw > > > > I find her thoughts more open, and integrated. Do you ? >
