This was not an effort to defy the rules of the group, mean spirited as any personal attack, or any negative disruption intended. From the heart, it was intended as the ultimate good. The only true way that I have found for myself! For that I apologize. Still your warning is well received. I did revisit the posted rules!
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:01 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > OK Ed (Pathfinder)…you have posted 65 times here at Minds Eye and know > that we don’t allow posters here to proselytize. If somehow you missed > it, please read: > http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye/web/posting-guidelines > > In other words, do not post attachments like the one you just posted > here again. > > OM > Moderator > > > On Aug 17, 8:43 pm, edward mason <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello everyone! Top of the day to you! >> I am seldom able to read a message on the group, much less know what is >> going on here. >> My time invested in trying to help others know and understand just what we >> are dealing with is a angry >> G_d or an off balanced energy who's instructions we received first in >> hieroglyphics. >> Then,after the diversification of the languages, the interpretations of the >> different countries >> turned into religions. >> However, I wanted to offer a little something here in effort that the >> people have something effective >> to work in these times. If men (humans) would step out of that wall that he >> has sealed himself into or allowed >> himself to be sealed into and would only hear the words of YHVH, Man would >> know that his only hope >> lies in understanding the instructions from it's original recordings. The >> slaughtering of the Stellar Priest was the fall of the Tower Of Babel. >> They were the only ones who ever knew their own writings. After that, the >> knowledge became babbling, and then the religions were built >> on the misinterpretations. >> My opinion on the attachment that I've made here is that one may pretend >> not make any sense of what >> is being said; And, of course, one could dismiss the idea for any host of >> reasons. But it can not be read, understood, >> then reasoned away. Anyone??? >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > So as we should all know we have had quite a week of it here in the >> > UK. Facebook and many other web places have been inundated with all >> > sorts of sillyness. >> >> > Calls to bring back national service, calls to evict those found >> > guilty of the rioting and looting, calls to stop their benifits. I >> > have witnessed some of my good good friends spew out all mannor of >> > sillyness in their anger. >> >> > I have procliamed in the past that all questions of morality are >> > better served sans emotions and I see much this week that has only >> > firmed this view. >> >> > In order to discover though the validity of this thought tell me do >> > you agree, or not and why? People of ME sway my opinion with your >> > wise words. >> >> > What good can come of deciding upon a course of action whilst holding >> > onto your anger? >> >> > I ask of course as a self confessed recovered angry man. >> >> >> >> Ed's File.pdf >> 1865KViewDownload
