And I heard- but cannot personally verify- that the Obama health care
law gives permission to access and use the financial holdings of all
participants. I think it's in the first hundred of the 2000 page bill
so that is another reason banking will not fail.

On Aug 22, 2:29 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry rigsyy cash can be tracked,, and it is illegal to transport
> large quantities.. and take it as drug profit.. can you prove differently,,
> if you can not it is theirs. It is far easier to transfer goods including
> internationally,,  it is simple as long as you do not violate the laws.
>
>  non banking honor debt will become a starting point..
> or so  I think
> Allan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:13 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If a bank customer writes checks for cash, how can the cash be
> > tracked?
>
> > On Aug 20, 9:17 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Strange  I was reading what you wrote Paradox  and the thought developed
> > in
> > > an economic subculture ,, were friends grooups of people would work for
> > the
> > > betterment of all  a simple example might be  if I could buy a product
> > > cheaper and then send it to those that wanted the product... setting
> > aside
> > > the funds so when there was a product that some one else needed..
>
> > > With todays computers it would not be difficult to see who held or owed
> > what
> > > debt.
>
> > > this not thought out just an rough idea.
> > > Allan
> > > On Aug 20, 2011 12:27 PM, "paradox" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I hear you Allan; but this particular current fibrillation is more
> > > > systemic. The perceptual issues arise because we are applying steady-
> > > > state macroeconomic frames to system-wide transition states, and the
> > > > makets just dont get it. So, there's a communications issue right
> > > > there.
>
> > > > The specific challenges for "developed" economies is growth and debt.
> > > > The inverse pressure is particularly intense bcause of the size of
> > > > third party debt obligations (hence the dysfunctional hyper-
> > > > sensitivity to ratings outlooks); as with business cycles, one would
> > > > normally assume greater debt to fund growth to pay down debt; in this
> > > > particular environment, greater debt leads to debt quality uncertainty
> > > > which drives up cost of borrowing, which constrains the growth you
> > > > leveraged for in the first place.
>
> > > > The solution, to me, requires will, commitment, frame breaking, and a
> > > > good deal of creative thinking. FIrst we need to suspend the inflation
> > > > "rule" for a transition window. Then Central Banks need to hold more
> > > > short term sovereign liabilities to provide "breathing space". Then
> > > > Treasuries need to take a scalpel to taxes, particularly but not
> > > > limited to transaction based taxes such as VAT, to spur economic
> > > > activity aggressively. Then to create sovereign long term retail
> > > > income bonds to fund fiscal shortfalls.
>
> > > > Just to be sure, we're here taking about the difference between growth
> > > > rates of 1-2% (current) and 4-5% (target). We're not taking about an
> > > > economic calamity, though you would not know it with the markets and
> > > > media dancing to their own music. It's very useful to bear that in
> > > > mind always.
>
> > > > On Aug 19, 3:31 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> My guess is people let them.. they take the word of and ?authority?
> > and
> > > call
> > > >> it good.   there is no challangee to the those that are creating the
> > > problem
> > > >> in the first place.. aka  bankers, stockmaarkets, corporations,,
> > greedy
> > > >> individuals
> > > >> Allan
> > > >> On Aug 19, 2011 1:12 PM, "paradox" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > Recently, i read of an "authority" on institutional debt proclaim
> > that
> > > >> > a global recession was now inevitable. My first thought was that
> > this
> > > >> > was something of a curious "God like" statement, which was actually
> > > >> > plain and simply wrong. There is actually next to no risk of a
> > global
> > > >> > recession.
>
> > > >> > How do they get away with stuff like this, i wonder?- Hide quoted
> > text
> > > -
>
> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
>  (
>   )
> |_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to