Let's wait to hear the expert's answers. :) On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:01 AM, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cute, is this true to the storyline of the creation of M-E or an > interesting narrative? I think the recent comparisons with AvC were to > point out what the moderator thinks this groups should avoid. What a > lovely rendition of perennial history besides, gabby! :) > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:19 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Understand from repeated referrals that the group founding impetus was > > wanting to be better than A vs. C. Do all of you know what or who A > > and C are? They must have been so traumatic that the B role must have > > seemed the only way out. The holy trinity, the triad, the magic number > > was being reestablished, the opposing duality overcome - by being B. > > The being B impetus then started to develop its own dynamics. Being B > > was being better than doing A vs. C. Being B was being identified as > > being misleading in its terminology, so the B was omitted and the > > state of being declared as being the ultimate state. > > > > A myth has come into effect. > > > > > > -- > Please do not put me on forwarding lists or submit my address to cute > online greetings or anything else for that matter. If you must, please > forward me in BCC and send me a link to cute greetings. Many thanks! >
