Poly because someone publishes something does not make it true,, it makes it his opinion
You a re dealing with the paper of an atheist who is publishing what he thinks is true.. It is no different that my saying what I think is true.. For me what I say is valid... what I am finding from this discussion group and a friend .. What I am finding is that there is a God. and every one has a soul including mr dawkins and that soul is what controls the body not unlike your body driving a car.. with the body being the soul and and the car playing the part of the body.. You can take the idea from there Allan On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:58 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]> wrote: > whats the difference between reply and reply to all?..anyway... i browsed > richard dawkins 'the god delusion' for a paper... in that he gives a case > for Aliens being Gods.. i mean why cant they.. from our limited > understanding..whats the difference..? > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hahahah in my experience even the best of Queens can be a little prissy at >> times. >> >> >> On Thursday, 25 October 2012 07:03:26 UTC+1, William L. Houts William L. >> Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OH, I agree with you about that. And it's basically the point I was >>> trying to make to my irascible friend, Matthew. I don't think you solve >>> your most difficult energy problems and go on to be a galactic terrorist. >>> Terrorism is largely a strategy of the weak. And if you've mastered >>> warp drive, then you probably have all kinds of toys available to you, >>> including zero point energy or some equivalent. >>> >>> I just finished reading Matt's latest post on Facebook. He sang a >>> waspish little aria about how I didn't understand reality and that he >>> wasn't enjoying this conversation at ALL, and that he was hereby closing >>> down his side of the argument. Matt really can be a pissy little queen >>> sometimes. >>> >>> >>> --Bill >>> >>> On 10/24/2012 10:01 AM, archytas wrote: >>> > I find it hard to think technologically advanced beings would be >>> > bastards Bill. The so-called trade of imperialism was actually >>> > depraved - with concentration camps, limb-severing and so on. Queens >>> > have to have their dramas mate! The aliens could be as bad as we have >>> > been. It would be good to explore good aliens and what such a good >>> > life might be. We could not, in current biological form, share it. >>> > They might leave us with the means to change so we could. I'd choose >>> > Damon Laplace's route in genetic change to travel the stars rather >>> > than live a normal life span in an agrarian collective - but I'd >>> > choose that over my current life in 'the economy'. >>> > >>> > In my least favourite episode of Voyager, Janeway refuses to drop her >>> > knickers for the technology that will get her crew home. There could >>> > be reasons for carrying a few casual queens in our crew! The quirks >>> > thrown up in evolution usually have their uses. >>> > >>> > I think the chimps and dolphins ponder the human questions Lee. Many >>> > animals, including chimps and scrub jays seem to hold 'funerals'. >>> > Some clams live 500 years (off Iceland) without our angst. My ideal >>> > aliens will have a rational hatred of soap opera. >>> > >>> > On 24 Oct, 16:23, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> I think that Human history shows that it is very hard to break out of >>> >> 'modes of thought' that eon, geography and culture instill into us. >>> >> How >>> >> hard then to reason as a non Earthling would? I think the only viable >>> >> answer to your question is to say, I don't know. >>> >> >>> >> Perhaps if we could get into the psyches of some of the other >>> >> creatures >>> >> that we share this planet with, we may find, or not, some >>> >> similarities. It >>> >> is an interesting question to ponder though. Does having >>> >> a consciousness at a level sufficient enough to >>> >> claim intelligence, inevitably lead to the asking of similar >>> >> questions? >>> >> Elephants, who I do belive to show a certain standard of >>> >> emotional understanding and intelligence, do they ask 'Life! What's it >>> >> all >>> >> about?' >>> >> >>> >> On Wednesday, 24 October 2012 12:19:42 UTC+1, William L. Houts William >>> >> L. >>> >> Houts Lukaeon William L. Houts wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> All right, I just wanted to run this by you guys. I know it seems >>> >>> I'm >>> >>> always rattlling on about aliens, but they're really a stand in for, >>> >>> well, for a lot of things. Anyway, I've been on Facebook and >>> >>> recently >>> >>> made a status report commenting on the conversation we had going on >>> >>> here >>> >>> about hypothetical aliens and what they might or might not want from >>> >>> us. And I was making the point that I made here: that said aliens >>> >>> will >>> >>> turn out to be just as befuddled by it all as we are, and are >>> >>> probably >>> >>> in no position to give us the goods on life's mysteries, or even make >>> >>> a >>> >>> good cocktail. >>> >>> Now, my friend Matt, who is very smart but also very bitchy, put >>> >>> forth >>> >>> Professor Hawking's notion: that we'd better keep our heads down >>> >>> low, >>> >>> because history tells us that when a more technologically advanced >>> >>> species meets a less developed one, the results are usually horrible >>> >>> for >>> >>> the latter. I replied that yes, this does seem to be the pattern in >>> >>> Earth history. But, I went on, races which manage to break the >>> >>> lightspeed barrier are going to have better things to do than enslave >>> >>> 7 >>> >>> billion people, or even mistreat them very much. Their energy >>> >>> problems, >>> >>> I said more or less, will have been solved to such an extent that >>> >>> they >>> >>> won't have to vampirize us. Matt made it clear that he thought I was >>> >>> being terrifically naive. >>> >>> Now, Mat is quickly becoming a sour old queen, but I want to know: >>> >>> with >>> >>> whom would you agree? Or is there a third answer which I haven't >>> >>> proposed here? >>> >>> --Bill >>> >>> -- >>> >>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead >>> >>> and boy are my arms tired." >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "I just flew in from the Land of the Dead >>> and boy are my arms tired." >>> >> -- >> >> >> > > > > > -- > EverComing > > -- > > > -- ( ) |_D Allan Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. I am a Natural Airgunner - Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. --
