Soul is the energy (or whatever you call that) that is bound/related to the
I/me. It is in a process of constant transformation and the scientists are
too slow to catch it and pin it down. That's the real problem. But not mine.

I am having great fun with my spelling checker and therefore attribute the
label 'old soul' to it! :)

2012/11/28 Lee Douglas <[email protected]>

> That is indeed what I belive, all that I am is in my brain, when that goes
> so do I.  What the soul may be, if I have one, I really don't know.
>
> On Wednesday, 28 November 2012 10:46:22 UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>
>> Lee, do you believe that you are this body and nothing separate from
>> it , because if you don't then you haven't accepted death.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > You see RP sometimes I think you make perfect sense but mostly your
>> > insistance on generalising winds me up no end.  Of course this does not
>> > explain Athiests, or my own stance on death, or for that matter lots of
>> > people. We are of course all differant with differant subjective ways
>> of
>> > seeing things and viewing life.  Myself being a Theist I'm still unsure
>> as
>> > to the existance of a Soul, I mean I really don't know yet if I belive
>> such
>> > a thing exists.  My own reasons for beliving in creative diety are many
>> and
>> > complex.  Belife simply cannot be stripped down to pithey sounding
>> short
>> > sentances that apply to all humans, because clearly they do not apply
>> to all
>> > humans.
>> >
>> > On another subject I have just posted that I have no fear of death and
>> have
>> > accepted that it may come at any time.  Perhaps then you do not realise
>> how
>> > insulting it is to be called a liar.  Or perhaps i'm too involved with
>> > semantics and concentrate more on your choice of words than the
>> message,
>> > ahhh but how else is one to treat written communication?  I must trust
>> that
>> > the words you use, you have choosen to portay your meaning.  So when
>> you say
>> > 'Yet we do not accept it...' I must belive that this is exactly what
>> you
>> > mean to say, in effect  you reduce me, and all other individuals to a
>> mass
>> > of humainity that follw the same rules.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, 28 November 2012 10:05:19 UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is death all around us and so we cannot fail to see it , yet we
>> >> do not accept it and so we have developed an idea of souls. Our belief
>> >> in after-life or re-births is our insistence on immortality as we find
>> >> it hard to accept that we will go into a permanent oblivion , never to
>> >> return.The instinct for survival makes us readily accept these notions
>> >> of immortality as our intelligence is also coloured by our instincts.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Heh where do you find these little sayings of yours RP.  Nope I
>> don't
>> >> > agree
>> >> > this is true .
>> >> >
>> >> > Personaly I have spent some years questioning the attitude to life
>> and
>> >> > death
>> >> > that we have.  It seems that for most life in and of itself is kinda
>> >> > sacred,
>> >> > or at least we act like it is.  I'm not sure on this though.  Dawin
>> >> > shows us
>> >> > that outside of our species death is a part of life and comes all
>> too
>> >> > easily.  So I must say that life in and of itself is nothing
>> special.
>> >> > Then
>> >> > you must mean life as we humans percive it.  However, I am now fully
>> >> > resigend to my own death and it will come when it does, and this no
>> >> > longer
>> >> > holds any fear for me.
>> >> >
>> >> > My own desires to live to be at least 400 years old though is by now
>> >> > widely
>> >> > reported here, and in other places.  This is not for the reasons you
>> >> > highlight above but sheer couriosity.  We are I feel at the cusp of
>> >> > enourmous change, over the next few hundred years we as a species
>> are
>> >> > about
>> >> > to change in so many ways, and I want to see it.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tuesday, 27 November 2012 07:28:21 UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for immortality and
>> the
>> >> >> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth. It is an
>> off-shoot
>> >> >> of the
>> >> >> instinct for survival.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>  --
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to