It would have been better to ask how you view nominalisation, than
teasing for details. I took the meaning to be the inevitable progression
to rejecting universals by becoming acquainted with the rules and
through experience learning to reject most of it as over simplification.
How far one could take that I think is a matter of appetite and
endurance, for better of worse, and reasons vary. In part I disagree
with the notion that the words we use are purely abstractions or can be
ideal representations of cognitive content, but that they can convey and
influence an amazing amount and types of content and experience when
skill and attention is applied. As a joke I told someone that writers
learn to imitate behavior to such a degree that gradually no memory or
sign of it remains.
The contrasts were my personal twist, but 'different' can be challenging
enough to ponder whether one could 'should think' thusly after all. I am
mixed on the matter, there are times of brilliance but also times that
it seems a curse.
On 2/11/2014 8:29 AM, gabbydott wrote:
Simplified in the sense of "intuitive" is how I understand Andrew.
Fine. What I often find lacking is simple common sense. Because of
personal twists blown out of proportion and put into bright spotlight.
To serve a specific purpose of those in control of the light switch.
Intuitively. Figuratively speaking. Worth giving a second thought, I find.
Which is what I did with your question, that is not really a question.
I mean, one cannot should think. Me thinketh, yes. Whether I like
what I see is out of my control, all I can do to have some sort of
manageable access to it is to accept it. Whether and how I speak out
my thoughts, live out my thoughts, deal with my thoughts, is another
question, not necessarily a contrasting one.
I'm okay with what you are saying.
2014-01-24 3:58 GMT+01:00 James <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
But, should one really think so or merely wish to accept it as
such? I've asked myself this when trying to sort out my own
contrasts. IMO to whatever degree you have it undoubtedly
contributes something of value, though you do have better
linguistic footing than me and obvious leanings into discourse
analysis (my lady just finished that class).
In dealing with memos having humor is good advice, going through
old things always seems to increase the gravity, lower the oxygen,
and slow time down. As to this 'Simplified' part, good luck with
that. :D
On 1/22/2014 4:53 AM, gabbydott wrote:
"View as set" is better... Thank you very much, Andrew.
Am 22.01.2014 00:02 schrieb "andrew vecsey"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>:
I think it would be fun to make a new video called "Gabby -
Simplified". I find it a very nice characteristic to be
able to
laugh at oneself. My sister and my partner can do that so
very well.
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:20:07 PM UTC+1, Gabby wrote:
I just found this short memo to myself from maybe one
or two
years ago:
/View nominalisation of knowledge as settled and discourse
about having knowledge or being in knowledge. /
This may sound awful in English, its original German
version
sounds ten times worse. I had to laugh when I read it
and I
thought it must have been an ironic reminder or a
parody of
someone or something. But then it dawned upon me that
I might
have really intended to try and do so. Now I am asking
you,
have you been seeing me doing anything like that?
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to
the Google
Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:minds-eye%[email protected]>
<mailto:minds-eye%[email protected]
<mailto:minds-eye%[email protected]>>.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:minds-eye%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:minds-eye%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
