Superfluous as in very runny perhaps? When the internet first came about, academics thought we might have non-authority-led discourse. Well - ho ho ho to that one. I can't see Gabbers being interested in a trolls charter, so I can only wonder what the honourable member might be on about, knowing any suggestion I might make only an interpretation. In England, twittering a picture of English flags and a white van has just become just another way to be sacked.
On Friday, 21 November 2014 10:01:34 UTC, Gabby wrote: > > Signing petitions is a wonderful thing. Signing contracts makes sense. But > what wonderful sense does automated signing make in postings that show the > name of the poster in the very beginning of each posting? > > As we have seen over the years here, the name of the poster is only the > pretext to and for the additional massage that is to be pushed into the > readers eye and further. Unfortunately for poster, the means of continuous > pain evocation only leads to thickening the scar tissue of the cornea and > the need to send out more sweet light increases. And so the evolutionary > spiral of no shadow without light is spinning higher and higher, further > and further. > > Now here is my suggestion for a peaceful dissolution: > Let's have the owner and moderators of the blue eye include all the bad > things, all the violence that we perceive in the world in the guidelines. > Let's suggest translations in all other languages! Let's make it very clear > that we only welcome those who obey! > > And signing could become superfluous. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
