As have many of us so emerged RP - the religious literature is not western in origin, nor 'our' philosophy of presence and will. I often wonder about our term 'Indian', spoken here with no knowledge that even a name like Singh is found amongst Jats, Gurjars, Rajputs, Rajanya Kayasthas, Kurmis, Yadavs, Manipuris, Bengali Hindus and Ahirs as well as by Sikhs. .
On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 11:20:54 PM UTC, RP Singh wrote: > > The 'Singh' surname is quite common among the Hindus. The Sikhs like > Buddhists and Jains emerged from the Hindus and shared many dogmas and > doctrines. > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:45 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Even the Greeks noticed gods tended to resemble people in the cultures > worshipping them. I'm not keen on the idea of god coming down to talk to > us, partly as 'voices in the head' can be a sign of pathology, > > Are there many Hindus called Singh RP? I always liked the notion the > surname was adopted to negate caste stuff. One has, in modern parlance, to > 'loll' - it's a sign of ageing young Gabby, and as my dad would have said, > will come to little old ageist you soon enough. Lost another tooth today - > no doubt, as a 'young buck' you will think, with my doddering old memory, I > shouldn't have taken it out in the first place. Max has been known to eat > my dentures. One can learn to forgive such excesses from friends, even > Allan, who should do more seeking. > > In the holographic universe, such as birth time might explain a lot, our > 'conversations' starting earlier than we generally think, perhaps with > history and future written at a vastly distant two-dimensional moving wall > and warp-connected blackhole-surfaces - no doubt all constructed so Allan > can tell us we are full of it. I too, like RP, am not what Allan would > have me born as. And I also resist Gabby's lust for me to act as an > authoritarian ModGod parent. If Molly plays 'not amused Victoria', I can > only laugh. What else could Albert do, creased by lead weights stretching > his male anatomy? > > RP articulates something much better than theory. The presence of his > advice is warm. Our restrictions in time and space may not be as they > currently seem and some mystic resolution may come to be a bigger part of > our day-to-day. Being led by mystics ain't it though. > > > > On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 6:26:54 PM UTC, facilitator wrote: > > God comes "down" all the time. In fact, that would have to be an > attribute of an omnipotent. We are the ones limited by time and space. > Giving God an image of our viewpoint is called an "Idol". > > On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 12:25:29 PM UTC-5, RP Singh wrote: > > I don't think God has ever come down to talk to man, so as a necessity we > have to give him an image according to our viewpoint. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > ... -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
