The traditional method is to go live in a cave in your underwear Gabby.  

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 5:43:42 PM UTC, Gabby wrote:
>
> [Jeez, I really get nothing done today.... anyways ... back to the logics 
> here...]
>
>
> Thank you very much for your response, Facil! I have gotten so used to not 
> being response-worthy, to only be an association provider or projection 
> surface that it always feels strange if someone actually responds to my 
> question. So yes, thank you for taking the time.
>
> You say: "Allan is very direct and you seem to be a bit cryptic in 
> response so this is naturally a communication barrier."
> I find myself very direct, I talk to people directly, address problems 
> directly, demand direct responsibility to be taken here. Whereas Allan is 
> hiding behind cryptic soul managers of life and indescribable God meetings 
> to explain the rule of Zombiedom preferably on an far away island with a 
> few other chosen super zombies. Strange how you come to think that the 
> communication barrier is built by me. I even used very, very simple 4 word 
> sentences to try to communicate with Allan ... no use, they were ignored. 
> Maybe it is a case of *like masters, like servants.*?
>
> Self inflicted isolation, yes, you have asked that before. I don't think 
> there is such a thing.
>
>
>
> 2015-03-06 18:04 GMT+01:00 'facilitator' via "Minds Eye" <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> Honestly Gabby I have not been back here long enough to do a proper 
>> evaluation. But I can give an outline of some of my observations.
>> Here are some points to consider:
>> Allan is older than I am and therefore biologically he has fewer speech 
>> and response inhibitors.  He has less trouble allowing his thoughts make 
>> their way to the top of his flapping lips.
>> Neil and Molly are very generous in allowing free speech, as I feel this 
>> is a good thing that should not be hindered.  If their is bias on any level 
>> then who becomes the next target?
>> This forum is replete with pendulum swings and I find even myself 
>> succumbing to responding emotionally as opposed to simple logic.
>> To be more tolerant and be teachable we must also allow others the right 
>> to be ignorant.
>> Allan is very direct and you seem to be a bit cryptic in response so this 
>> is naturally a communication barrier.
>> Problem people become self evident so there really is no need to expunge 
>> someone form the forum unless they outright threaten an individual.
>> It may well be that because you are a woman you are treated differently.  
>> I often thought of an experiment in which someone joins a group using two 
>> identities one as male and one as female, with similar takes and responses, 
>> wondering the outcome.
>> Do the leaders here Isolate you?  I don't know.  If you feel isolated 
>> then that is a problem.  But whether that is self inflicted, again, I don't 
>> know you that well.
>>
>> On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 11:42:25 AM UTC-5, Gabby wrote:
>>>
>>> May I ask you, Facil, what you think the reason is that Allan can more 
>>> or less wear any language outfit he wants whereas the leaders here try to 
>>> isolate me if I only take out my pocket mirror and turn it in their 
>>> direction? Do you have a theory? Do you think it is because I am a woman?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/minds-eye/-5LTfst-rD0/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to