We might think about the flow of embodiment - 'flow' is kinda in in thermodynamics at the moment.
There is flow from the public domain into and across individuals with similar and different effects in personal embodiment. There is flow out of individuals that socially constructs and can (to some extent) be embodied in machines. This looks like some kind of dynamic circuit. On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 7:05:16 PM UTC, Molly wrote: > > I think emotions are mental constructs that begin with feeling, and then > are heaped with repetitive experience memories and personality complexes. > Very different than the pure feeling of the Sufi whirling. I actually have > a copy of Sartre's: The Emotions, Outline of a Theory here. He was a better > Existentialist than Phenomonologist. Dry stuff. > > On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 2:10:39 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >> >> I was thinking, Molly, that some people hoard emotions and get very >> bitter and twisted - the old 'stamp collecting' notion of TA. One possible >> thought on the autistic mind is that it is so sensitive to emotion it has >> to cope by shutdown. This is intense world theory. I like this in >> principle, but some suggested treatments are truly awful (stimulus >> deprivation in infancy). There is also 'extreme male brain' theory, >> applicable to females as brain structure is not simply gendered. >> >> Imagination has long been central to 'theory of mind' - autistics can >> lack any clue other people think and feel like them. The idea that they >> might be under 'sensory attack' rather than deprivation would explain a lot >> of what I feel amonst other people or even watching newsrooms. I find >> people in rituals particularly daunting as my first feeling is disgust. >> >> On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 5:35:01 PM UTC, archytas wrote: >>> >>> You imagined the hurricane. Butterflies are in pupal stage. Unless the >>> RAF is using them due to budget cuts. >>> >>> On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 5:31:19 PM UTC, archytas wrote: >>>> >>>> Remember, in Flatland women are just lines, we men triangles and on to >>>> upper-caste hexagons. The problem is that the lines are sharpened to a >>>> point at both ends and entirely dangerous. Luud will only worry when you >>>> sat something sensible, which as we know is profoundly non-human. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 5:08:33 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oh understand the defect human subroutine.. i hope Luud never catches >>>>> on.. >>>>> >>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 6:03 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Embodied Imagination >>>>> >>>>> It's not a spellcheck error Allan - you'll be running the 'look more >>>>> like a defective human' subroutine. >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 4:55:12 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> lol i think so .. maybe that is the funny sound I keep hearing.. >>>>>> you would think they could correct the constant spelling errors.. >>>>>> >>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Sent: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 5:13 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Embodied Imagination >>>>>> >>>>>> Artificial Intelligence and more recent linguistics has reached the >>>>>> same conclusion.. Do you find yourself beeping a lot these days Allan? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 4:02:55 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He sounds like a lot of people I have listen to over the years. More >>>>>>> than a few have played it for the money angle, sadly.. for them my >>>>>>> favorite >>>>>>> bible verses are "He went and hung himself . . . Go do thou likewise." >>>>>>> Let >>>>>>> see the first part comes from Judas betrayal of Jesus and the second >>>>>>> part >>>>>>> from the story of the good sarmeratan (sp). There is a lot of crafting >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> reach the desired goal as i tried to demonstrate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a lot of guidance for spiritual development... but i have >>>>>>> problem with the every verse rhetoric..especially in english.. the >>>>>>> reasoning is the english language structure is based off the paragraph >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> the complete thought. Often times the sentence creates only a partial >>>>>>> idea. >>>>>>> To many people try to justify their bad behavior and actions as >>>>>>> spiritual >>>>>>> guidance.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are good guidelines ten commandments. Jesus love your neighbor >>>>>>> as yourself .. stories demonstrating examples of proper behavior but >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> written step by step instruction. Recently the perspective came forward >>>>>>> that there is a highway to hell and a staircase to Heaven.. that just >>>>>>> demonstrates the expected traffic flow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For me spirituality is developing and demonstrating the soul's >>>>>>> connection with the Presence.. that connection determines your >>>>>>> position >>>>>>> within the mandala of the Totality of the Presence. Which is beyond my >>>>>>> ability to comprehend. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين >>>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Molly <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Sent: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 2:31 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Embodied Imagination >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think much of what is in the public domain is crafted instead of >>>>>>> created, and crafted to sell, so crafted to gain audience action (that >>>>>>> converts to money for someone.) That takes skill, but little >>>>>>> imagination. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I originally discovered Neville when I was exploring the notion of >>>>>>> resurrection, and he wrote a lecture called Resurrection that is I >>>>>>> think, >>>>>>> his masterpiece and I have yet to understand. Like Hermann Hesse's >>>>>>> Glass >>>>>>> Bead Game, the culmination of his life's work. I read it over and over >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> it means something different each time and I understand it more over >>>>>>> time. >>>>>>> My husband and I both then read the body of his work from beginning to >>>>>>> end >>>>>>> and could understand better the development of his life's work. When >>>>>>> Neville moved from his earlier message that "Your Faith is Your >>>>>>> Fortune" to >>>>>>> "Immortal Man" he began losing his audience, at least those who were >>>>>>> looking for get rich quick schemes or mind over matter techniques. His >>>>>>> work >>>>>>> moves his audience from duality (The Law) manifest to awareness of our >>>>>>> infinite being, where life manifests for us very differently (The >>>>>>> Promise). >>>>>>> "All that you behold, though it appears without, it is within in your >>>>>>> own >>>>>>> wonderful human imagination of which this world of mortality is but a >>>>>>> shadow." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The wonderful thing about Neville, I think, is that he puts out the >>>>>>> notion that the Lord is our imagination. A bold notion that left him >>>>>>> lecturing to the walls at the end of his career. Living in the world of >>>>>>> Cesar, or mortality, or duality, (The Law) we are chasing the laws of >>>>>>> cause >>>>>>> and effect that govern us. Recognition is all that is required of >>>>>>> immortal >>>>>>> man for manifestation, or non-dual awareness (The Promise) and >>>>>>> imagination >>>>>>> is the instrument within us all that takes us there. Because Neville >>>>>>> sees >>>>>>> every bible verse as an instruction on using imagination for divine >>>>>>> revelation, those that cannot grasp this are lost in the rhetoric and >>>>>>> connotation of "religion." For him, it is about imagination, not >>>>>>> religion. >>>>>>> Because I agree with him wholeheartedly on this one point, I find his >>>>>>> body >>>>>>> of work palatable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All of the christian mystics that I've read see scripture as a >>>>>>> diagram for living. Neville is distinctive because of his treatment of >>>>>>> imagination. I recognize truth in this notion, because my own >>>>>>> imagination >>>>>>> creates and reduces to simplicity for my own divine breakthroughs and >>>>>>> recognition. In sleep and waking life. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am certainly not advocating his work as the be all end all for a >>>>>>> study or discussion on imagination. But this one idea of his may be >>>>>>> critical to any intimate dialogue of the subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 7:56:54 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess my questions generally relate to critical absorption rather >>>>>>>> than the passive. We have to know more about why so much in the >>>>>>>> public >>>>>>>> domain is so bland, copied,ice-cream, beer, pets - and what >>>>>>>> imagination >>>>>>>> this feeds. We might wonder where Habermas' communicative rationality >>>>>>>> (whatever) shows up - where an imaginative lifeworld exists. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Much that many feel as imaginative is actually produced by a few >>>>>>>> simple rules. These can be embodied in machines, even to the point of >>>>>>>> narrative generation. What can we imagine imaginative in the next >>>>>>>> action >>>>>>>> flick? Was one war film made in 1943 and endlessly copied since? The >>>>>>>> mystics have had a long run and there is certainly a core. I wonder >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> potential free play, rather than institutionalized Utopia of >>>>>>>> imagination >>>>>>>> rules we embody in genre and machine, whether metal or >>>>>>>> internal-organic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 10:59:28 PM UTC, archytas wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's more that I prefer what you say and demonstrate Molly. We >>>>>>>>> have to hope in something simple, though it may emerge from complex >>>>>>>>> work, >>>>>>>>> perhaps the simplexity angle. The imagination, in many childhood >>>>>>>>> studies, >>>>>>>>> is connected with deception and, of course, in the wilderness. >>>>>>>>> Otherwise, >>>>>>>>> without nanoprobes we will never get Allan up to speed as a true >>>>>>>>> heretic! >>>>>>>>> Neville Goddard creates 'black boxes I don't need - they communicate >>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>> well in a compelling logic but I'm left outside it. You don't do >>>>>>>>> this and >>>>>>>>> are more like Abbott, with his sense of humour. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the film spoiler Allan - I did try it for 5 minutes but >>>>>>>>> felt it lacked imagination. I couldn't read Terry Pratchett or Harry >>>>>>>>> Potter, even Lewis Carroll. Autistic people often lack the >>>>>>>>> imagination we >>>>>>>>> use in understanding others and perhaps the feelings to work back >>>>>>>>> through. >>>>>>>>> We don't all have to be singers from the same page. Religion can >>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>> socially approved epistemic authority, but needs to leave critical >>>>>>>>> space. >>>>>>>>> If we look outwards, much claimed as product of the imagination is >>>>>>>>> dull >>>>>>>>> copy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 9:39:11 PM UTC, Molly wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You don't like many of my links, that's OK, don't mind. Yoga, >>>>>>>>>> Vedanta and Kundalini, as mystical paths, all take feeling into the >>>>>>>>>> higher >>>>>>>>>> levels of consciousness. I don't think the practice of the path >>>>>>>>>> matters. We >>>>>>>>>> all have our own. I think that knowing the feeling, and returning >>>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>>> the feeling, is an important way to explore and return to the >>>>>>>>>> highest >>>>>>>>>> states. I think the highest consensus state may be simple and silent >>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>> Allan suggests, and I agree that it is how it feels to me also. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 1:08:24 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think Neville gets nearly everything wrong, proceeding by >>>>>>>>>>> repeated assertions. He lacks a lot you have Molly. Tony and >>>>>>>>>>> Rufus is >>>>>>>>>>> instructive on who is imaging whom. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 4:50:43 PM UTC, Molly wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A state of feeling as the spark of life's continuity is worthy >>>>>>>>>>>> of a lot of discussion and contemplation >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.feelingisthesecret.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>> and Neville Goddard based his life's work on the notion that >>>>>>>>>>>> putting ourselves into a state of consciousness with feeling is >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> mechanism for the manifestation of reality. You will have to >>>>>>>>>>>> forgive, >>>>>>>>>>>> because he is also a Christian mystic, siting biblical quotes with >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> interpretation that they were clues to this secret. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure it was such a secret. Every mystical tradition says >>>>>>>>>>>> the same thing in some form. And science does seem to be catching >>>>>>>>>>>> up. I am >>>>>>>>>>>> ever in search of the original edition of Einstein's "The World As >>>>>>>>>>>> I See >>>>>>>>>>>> It" that was part of my university's rare book section and I could >>>>>>>>>>>> often be >>>>>>>>>>>> caught sitting in the isle reading it for inspiration. There are >>>>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>>>> subsequent editions, none as good. He was a brilliant intellect >>>>>>>>>>>> and spirit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:04:56 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The philosophy of an imagination looking outwards is >>>>>>>>>>>>> fascinating, though relies on rather behaviourist tricks in some >>>>>>>>>>>>> guises. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ludwig Fleck had some good stuff on what was out now being in, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but whose >>>>>>>>>>>>> is it questioning. It's interesting we had Feynman (who also >>>>>>>>>>>>> loved his >>>>>>>>>>>>> bee, wacky baccy and womanising), Waddington, Medawar, Horton, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Soddy and >>>>>>>>>>>>> many others while social constructivists told us we were >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'heartless >>>>>>>>>>>>> positivists'. The wrong ideas on science still pertain, I think >>>>>>>>>>>>> conflated >>>>>>>>>>>>> with heartless bureaucracy and bossy versions of religion. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The 'state of feeling' is worthy of a lot of discussion and >>>>>>>>>>>>> contemplation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 2:43:50 PM UTC, Molly wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've saved the paper to read after my nap, Neil. Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scanning it made me realize how hooked I am on visual >>>>>>>>>>>>>> organization with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> header styles, bullet points and all the other nonsense. And how >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ridiculous >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am for it. I'm also intrigued that the paper references >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feynman who I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> love, mostly because he plays bongos and loves his orange juice: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/2Ks8gsK22PA <https://youtu.be/2Ks8gsK22PA> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 10:11:15 AM UTC-4, archytas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have an internal movie screen, though its presence is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intermittent, sometimes glorious and once traumatic. The way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we process >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information has multiple logics, including the way memory is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in order to let us put different jigsaw pictures together for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> futures. The universe itself may be doing something like this, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having time backwards. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a more simple way, imagination allows us to think things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through, and personally I try what seems a reverse of Molly's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embodiment - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that of the embodiment of the human in machine. The idea is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not to create >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> androids, but rather imagination that can take us past current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and provide enhancement for human being. Imagination is one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way to test in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual reality and not get one's fingers burned. There are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounts of how >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experiencing a Van Gogh played a role in constructing the model >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> galaxy. I even see similarities between Molly's treatment of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-believers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and attempts to make the semantic web compatible in difference. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fascinated by kaleidoscopes as a kid. Fascinated later by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how machines could repeat simple equations at vast speed and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> produce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patterns (fractals, chaos) doing something so mundane, yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather like all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7 billion of us putting different number values into 2x = y at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time and linking up the pattern. Imagination has a lot to do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with pattern >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spotting. If Molly looks to spiritual awakening, I tend to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look for cosmic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code. Her methods may be introspective, but what was more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introspective >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Socrates' claim the knowledge was already in there and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be found >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the right questions? I look out, though suspect these >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distinctions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lapse in good sense, compassion and non-jealous integration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony turns some plumbing pipes and a mask into a static >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'creature' that 'moves' with perspective and focus. I let it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride in my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mind - though I could just hate him for his talent (I don't). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I more the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kind of chap who would borrow any left over pipe to keep the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> washing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine running. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any looking out is always experienced in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> internal-virtual. We think the universe is beige. Space may >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fluidic, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elastic (more Hooke than Newton), potentially catapult-like so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evade the limitations of space-time by standing still in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moving space. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Imaging outwards was a William Blake theme - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://ttj.sagepub.com/content/25/4/495.full.pdf - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dramatic unveiling of the inter- action of varied human >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personalities, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with its gradual focusing of atten- tion upon the two major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protagonists, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and with its brilliantly skillful dis- closure of a symbolism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which leads >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the imagination outwards in widening ... experiments in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender, both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> socially and artistically, can remind us all of the constant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bravery >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary to force the universe of the imagination outwards. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Albert Einstein suggested that the elusive, additional >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> element needed for high achievement in science is a "state of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feeling" in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the researcher, which he called "akin to that of the religious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worship per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or of one who is in love," arising not from a deliberate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program but from a personal necessity. Others are more down to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth. With >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eloquent simplicity P. W. Bridgman wrote, "The scientific >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method, as far as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is a method, is nothing more than doing one's damnedest with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one's mind, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no holds barred." But as good as they are, neither remark nor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occasional anecdotal confession is much help for discovering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after. Peter Medawar put it this way, though a bit harshly: "It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is of no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use looking to scientific papers, for they not merely conceal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but actively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misrepresent the reasoning that goes into the work they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> describe... .Only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unstudied evidence will do-and that means listening at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyhole." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Free paper here - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://eppl604-autism-and-creativity.wmwikis.net/file/view/20013446.pdf/201762974/20013446.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, imagining anyone will read so as to shake >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themselves from non-participation is imaginary. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-importance of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> petty gossip may be rather like a rabbit hole world. What we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can imagine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has already been warped by what is so easy to soak up from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'garbage in' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, including not being able to get over oneself as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> centre of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> universe. I was taught about the irrational and spasmodic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nature of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> science from books written in and before the 60's. Molly is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closer to this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the frauds pretending science is rational. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:02:58 PM UTC, Molly wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea of embodied imagination (Jungian) introduces the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notion that through dreams, imagination presents us with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete reality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is different from our waking reality, not constrained by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rationality, and based more on our individual archetypal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system of symbols. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My latest thinking is that we carry this system into our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waking conscious >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life, but are less aware of it because of the constraints our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rationality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imposes when awake. This system may be what calls us into a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spiritual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awakening to more fully integrate all levels of consciousness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Several years ago I was invited (all expenses paid) to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucidity >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Institute <http://lucidity.com/> in Hawaii for a month >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long study in dreaming and consciousness. There have been a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few invitations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I regret not feeling free enough to accept in my life and this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is one, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mother in law was in hospice in our home and those love >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ties reign. Even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a kid I paid attention to my dreams and it has been for me, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a life long >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fascination. It has led me to understand that there are states >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness in both waking and sleeping that are the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peak states, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the movie on the screen has a different tone, like the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between Brooks' Blazing Saddles and Polanski's McBeth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that imagination is the mechanism that puts the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> movie on screen in all circumstances. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
