I tried to read it ..  tried and I  am not a good trier. . I do not visualise 
God  as gender. It is a difficult  problem. . The best I have seen the problem 
answered  is "S/He" ... period.
In my reading I see gender expressed I hear gender expressed.. my problem  is 
in reality the soul world  know and understand knows no gender.. among my 
spiritual friends there is an lack of gender..  there is an awareness of 
peoples desire for gender. From what I have seen there seems to always be an 
under lying tone of dominance ..  always avoided and denyed but there.

It seems almost childish. . If you remove gender from the concept of God a 
different picture starts to emerge. From what I  read somewhere  lost.. gender 
in the spiritual reality does not exist so I  do not understand stand the need 
for gender.

تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others

-----Original Message-----
From: archytas <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 6:02 AM
Subject: Mind's Eye Honest Alter Universes

Although we could look at physics that tells us our shadow is real and that 
when we walk away from it we enter a fifth dimension, there is little 
chance of us experiencing anything much different from this theorising are 
in the bugger all to slight range.  I've attached a masters level thesis on 
the divine feminine.  I don't actually like this work, though it is more 
welcome than most of the drivel students are forced into.  It may seem odd 
that a scientist like me finds more pertinent in changing our ways of 
living for the better in an obvious fiction like the divine feminine and 
what I regard as a largely failed 'new paradigm' set of research methods.  

Molly currently has everything solid melting to air and the imagination 
central in creation and evolving processes.  Of course, I'm not keen on 
solids 'meting to air' - it's piss poor chemistry and these days we think 
there may be hundreds of states of matter.  I wonder what we can honestly 
say about alter universes.  I find the literature generally weak like this 
thesis and wide open to easy criticism.  How can we be imaginatively 
creative, perhaps even in Molly's strong sense of this, and remain honest?

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to