Send MinGW-Notify mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/listinfo/mingw-notify
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MinGW-Notify digest..."


Please do not reply to this notification; the sender address is unable to 
accept incoming e-mail.  If you wish to unsubscribe you can do so at 
https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/listinfo/mingw-notify.



Today's Topics:

   1. [mingw] #41070: Please include libgccjit with MinGW GCC
      distribution (MinGW Notification List)
   2. [mingw] #41070: Please include libgccjit with MinGW GCC
      distribution (MinGW Notification List)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:22:32 +0200
From: MinGW Notification List <[email protected]>
To: OSDN Ticket System <[email protected]>
Subject: [MinGW-Notify] [mingw] #41070: Please include libgccjit with
        MinGW GCC distribution
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

#41070: Please include libgccjit with MinGW GCC distribution

  Open Date: 2020-12-23 19:28
Last Update: 2021-01-09 10:22

URL for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net//projects/mingw/ticket/41070
RSS feed for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=3917&tid=41070

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Last Changes/Comment on this Ticket:
2021-01-09 10:22 Updated by: eliz

Comment:

Reply To keith

    Reply To eliz

        Btw, judging by the Info manual that comes with libgccjit, a more
        appropriate name for the DLL would be libgccjit-10.dll, since it
        implements LIBGCCJIT_ABI_10 (and the next versions of GCC advance the
        ABI by several more notches). MinGW64 also calls it libgccjit-0.dll, so
        we could adopt the same name, regardless. But then we will need to
        invent ABI numbers out of thin air for future releases, which might be
        sub-optimal.

    Our DLL version numbering scheme, like that also used by Cygwin, is based
    on the libtool interface version numbering conventions; like Cygwin, we
    compute the number, included within the DLL file name, as the libtool
    current version number minus the libtool age. In this case, current would
    appear to be 10, but, as David has indicated, ABI 10 is backwardly
    compatible with ABI 0, and every version between. Thus, age would also be
    10, and the appropriate current - age result is, indeed, 0.

I'm aware of the numbering scheme, I just wasn't sure that libtool was involved
in the build and applied the scheme. From your description I deduced, perhaps
incorrectly, that building libgccjit for MinGW was not yet supported, and that
led me to the conclusion that perhaps the 0 part was some kind of default, not
a number correctly calculated from the ABI data.

It is also a certain surprise for me to read that adding entry points is still
considered to be a "compatible" ABI. I always thought that if the DLL name
remains the same, then any program linked against any version with that name
will be able to run with any other version of that DLL that has the same name.
I guess there's something new to learn every day...

Is libgccjit indeed fully backward compatible, btw?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket Status:

      Reporter: eliz
         Owner: keith
          Type: Feature Request
        Status: Open [Owner assigned]
      Priority: 5 - Medium
     MileStone: (None)
     Component: GCC
      Severity: 5 - Medium
    Resolution: None
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ticket details:

Please add libgccjit to the binaries included in the MinGW GCC distributions.
This is required to be able to build projects that use libgccjit for JIT
compilation of code. One example of this is "gccemacs", a branch of GNU Emacs
development (soon to land on the master branch of Emacs) that compiles Emacs
Lisp programs into native x86 code for faster runtime performance.

Thank you.



-- 
Ticket information of MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows project
MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Project is hosted on OSDN

Project URL: https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/
OSDN: https://osdn.net

URL for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/ticket/41070
RSS feed for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=3917&tid=41070


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:28:12 +0200
From: MinGW Notification List <[email protected]>
To: OSDN Ticket System <[email protected]>
Subject: [MinGW-Notify] [mingw] #41070: Please include libgccjit with
        MinGW GCC distribution
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

#41070: Please include libgccjit with MinGW GCC distribution

  Open Date: 2020-12-23 19:28
Last Update: 2021-01-09 11:28

URL for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net//projects/mingw/ticket/41070
RSS feed for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=3917&tid=41070

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Last Changes/Comment on this Ticket:
2021-01-09 11:28 Updated by: eliz

Comment:

Reply To keith

    Reply To eliz

        Why is libgccjit need to depend on libintl anyway?

    However, I do see that the version of gcc.exe in FRS is double the size of
    my staged copy, and appears to be statically linked with both libiconv.a
    and libintl.a, rather than with libiconv.dll.a and libintl.dll.a. I think I
    know why, but I'd like to review the issue; the DLL dependencies were
    intended.

I think statically linking against libintl is a Good Thing, especially since,
as we see, the newer libintl-8.dll is not 100% compatible, as it causes the
program to use libintl's version of setlocale. If using that entry point could
be avoided, then a dynamic dependency on libintl wouldn't be a problem, I think
(or rather hope). Otherwise, it's a bit of DLL hell, given the same name of the
DLL.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket Status:

      Reporter: eliz
         Owner: keith
          Type: Feature Request
        Status: Open [Owner assigned]
      Priority: 5 - Medium
     MileStone: (None)
     Component: GCC
      Severity: 5 - Medium
    Resolution: None
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ticket details:

Please add libgccjit to the binaries included in the MinGW GCC distributions.
This is required to be able to build projects that use libgccjit for JIT
compilation of code. One example of this is "gccemacs", a branch of GNU Emacs
development (soon to land on the master branch of Emacs) that compiles Emacs
Lisp programs into native x86 code for faster runtime performance.

Thank you.



-- 
Ticket information of MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows project
MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows Project is hosted on OSDN

Project URL: https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/
OSDN: https://osdn.net

URL for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/ticket/41070
RSS feed for this Ticket:
    https://osdn.net/ticket/ticket_rss.php?group_id=3917&tid=41070


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
MinGW-Notify mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/listinfo/mingw-notify


------------------------------

End of MinGW-Notify Digest, Vol 40, Issue 8
*******************************************

Reply via email to