Kai Tietz schrieb: > 2009/9/14 Wolfgang Glas <[email protected]>: >> Kai Tietz schrieb: >>> 2009/9/14 Wolfgang Glas <[email protected]>: >>>> JonY schrieb: >>>>> On 9/14/2009 02:46, Wolfgang Glas wrote: >> [snip] >>>>> Sourceware binutils CVS HEAD is generally stable. Version numbers like >>>>> 2.20.51 are development snapshots (the HEAD snapshots gets updated >>>>> daily), while 2.19.1 is a released to the public version. >>>> OK, I've found the following recent sourceware binutils packages: >>>> >>>> binutils-2.19.51.tar.bz2 2009/09/04 07:42 18 057 370 >>>> binutils-2.19.90.tar.bz2 2009/09/10 13:58 17 415 613 >>>> binutils-2.20.51.tar.bz2 2009/09/14 07:41 18 079 354 >>>> >>>> Which one should I try in order to get a maximal test coverage for >>>> gcc-4.4.2? >>>> Will a 2.20.x version needed for mingw-w64-4.4.2 or is 2.20 only needed >>>> for a >>>> shared libc++ build? Is 2.19.90 nore stable than 2.19.90 ? >>> to preferred versions of binutils are 2.19.90 and 2.20.x (I assume we >>> will release already with 2.20.x) >> i Kai, >> >> I will then try to augment mingw-w64-gcc-4.4.0-1 with binutils-2.19.90 and >> current CVS's HEAD of mingw-w64-headers. I will then try to build >> omniorb/libxml2/qt-4 and give you feedback of my mileage. >> >> Does this configuration give you reasonable quality data for you upcoming >> gcc-4.4.2 based release? >> >> Or should I push binutils to 2.20 and try a shared libstdc++ build? >> > > Hi Wolfgang, > > Well, better build for 4.4.1 instead. This gives us for i?86 better > information. The x64 build should be done with 4.4.2 (prerelease), as > there were major changes with big impact. As 4.4.2 is nearly stable > (some few issues are pending of not that much impact in comparision to > 4.4.1), I would say try it with this version better.
OK, I will wait for the gcc-4.4-20090915 weekly snapshot, which appears tomorrow and will try to build the whole toolchain together with CVS HEAD of mingw-w64 CRT and headers and binutils-2.20.51. After all this I will give you feedback about the quality of this configuration let's say by Sunday, September 12th. Please expect, that a Qt-4.5.2 build unveils some minor bugs in mingw-w64-headers. From my spotting at CVS HEAD of mingw-w64-headers I expect two or three minor patches, which I will send to you as soon as te whole thing settles down a bit. Regards, Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
