On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2010/3/22 Doug Semler <dougsem...@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Doug Semler <dougsem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, in fact is this entry-point a no issue. By a recent patch, ld is > able to select the proper entry-point without the need of specifying > the -e <entry>. So this argument is in fact deprecated. Major pain > here is the backward-compatibility necessary for older binutils. Buf > for 4.6 I would prefer to make a crued break in support of older > binutils versions (at least if configure for using no-underscore > variant). > In light of that - the patch for ld --no-leading-underscores doesn't work if you don't patch gcc to handle that...because the linker will select default entry of 1000 because it isn't able to find _dllmaincrtstar...@12 that is passed by gcc as the desired entry point. I guess the logic for the entry point in the linker could be looked at though... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
