On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:52 AM, t66...@gmail.com <t66...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/05/2010 11:49 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:46 PM, t66...@gmail.com<t66...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/05/2010 11:17 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:00 PM, t66...@gmail.com<t66...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>> You built a cross-binutils-2.20.1 but kept the rest as the same >>>> yes? >>>> >>> Initially I built the gcc cross compiler with cross-binutils-cvs. >>> >>>> I think that's why it fails. Binutils-cvs has the undrerscoring >>>> changes but release versions of gcc-4.4.4 and gcc-4.5.0 do >>>> not. >>>> >>> So are you saying that I should use gcc-4.4.4 + binutils-cvs ? >>> Or use gcc 4_4-branch + binutils-cvs? >>> >> 4.4 series will never officially have the underscoring >> changes unless you patch it yourself. Therefore, if you >> are using an unmodified 4.4.x, you should use binutils >> 2.20.1 or a cvs snapshot<= 2010-04-25. >> > Thank you for the very helpful advice, I will try again later from the > start. > Just a quick note: You can use the binutils-cvs with gcc 4.4 series if you configure binutils with --enable-leading-mingw64-underscores You can build gcc 4.5 and 4.6 against older versions of binutils (or binutils built with --enable-leading-mingw64-underscores) with the same option during gcc's configure. That option was purposely added for this reason :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
