On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:34 PM, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Jarrod, >> >> 2010/5/22 Jarrod Chesney <[email protected]>: >>> Hi All >>> This is my patch for the mingw-w64-headers for the comutil issues >>> (for uuid support ???) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The changes to crt/_mingw.h are only for testing the patch and shouldn't be >>> applied. >>> >>> Test unit : >>> bash-3.2$ cat test.cc >>> #include <windows.h> >>> #include <comdef.h> >>> >>> int main() >>> { >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> Compile command : >>> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -isystem >>> ~/src/mingw-w64/trunk/mingw-w64-headers/crt -isystem >>> ~/src/mingw-w64/trunk/mingw-w64-headers/include -isystem >>> ~/src/mingw-w64/trunk/mingw-w64-headers/defaults/include/ -c test.cc >>> >>> Regards, Jar (256fx) >> >> The patch looks fine to me on a first glance. I'll look into it >> tomorrow in more detail. >> >> Thanks for your work, >> Kai >> >> -- >> | (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste >> | (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help >> | (")_(") him gain world domination >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mingw-w64-public mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public >> > > Ping, or is this thread continued elsewhere?
IIRC, the patch was applied to the trunk, except for the parts touching _mingw.h, of course, but can't remember which revision it was. I wonder how it turned out, though (don't know anything about com stuff)? Is it eligible for the 1.0 branch or is it too experimental? -- Ozkan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
