On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Henry N. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10.06.2010 19:04, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> FYI >>>> >>>> A bunch of more headers removed from the ddk/ dir of the svn repo =( >>>> >>> Ugh!... :-(( >>> More job for me checking all the dependencies. Ugh ugh ugh.. >>> >>> -- >>> Ozkan >>> >> OK, committed rev. 2488 and sync'ed with their rev. 47727. >> There were no new deps, just one file removed, one file added >> and some files moved from ddk to psdk. (I don't mean to say >> that I didn't miss anything, though..) > > Why not use directories include/ddk and include/psdk as they are? Why > needs to merge into one directory? > > -- > Henry N.
Because while their psdk and our includes aren't exactly the same as each other, there are many duplicated files in each. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
