On 21/06/2010 10:43 PM, Doug Semler wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:38 PM, [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello: >> >> Yesterday I encountered a really weird / oddly gcc bug. >> AFAICT , that gcc-4_5 branch during that last past month that the C++ >> was changed. >> Now that the C99 implementation of C++ is in GCC 4.5 branch which indeed >> breaks a mingw-w64 compiler, in that aspect of C++. >> >> In the internal gcc libstdc++ ATM it defaults to using a strictly C99 >> implementation of. >> >> So far I see it is breaking the cstdlib and cwchar. >> >> Until somebody fixes this C99 specific stuff of Cplusplus it is broken. >> > > Do you have an example, including preprocessed source, of the failure? >
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2990320&group_id=202880&atid=983356 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
