On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up on a recent discussion on the bug tracker, I'd like to know
> what came of this discussion on the gcc list:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01114.html
>
> Is there a need to open a new bug report, is it fixed somewhere upstream,

No, it is not.

> should I annoy the devs with spam about this? ;)
>
> How about the whole /mingw directory, is there a way to fix this or have gcc
> people already refused that?
>

Well, with our builds, gcc includes its own headers first
and then the system provided headers, that's where the
problem is. As for a solution no one agreed upon anything,
nor did they openly refused anything.

> And last but not least, how are things on the runtime dll naming scheme? And
> the support for /lib32 and /lib64 vs /lib? If I need to bug the gcc list,
> I'll be glad to :) (pun intended).
>

Kai would answer that better.

> Ruben
>

--
Ozkan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to