On 9/7/2010 01:34, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09/06/2010 04:52 PM, JonY wrote:
>> On 9/6/2010 19:50, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>>>> On 9/6/2010 15:52, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>>>>> I'm the original author of the issue [0] that Ismail referenced. During
>>>>> the last months since my report, I've repeatedly re-tried numerous
>>>>> times,
>>>>> but failed to build the canadian cross. Actually, back then mostly the
>>>>> same suggestions where given, tried, and failed. As you can see from my
>>>>> post, I've tried the following compile instructions:
>>>>>     - makefile: mingw64 svn
>>>>> experimental/buildsystem/makebuildroot-test.mk
>>>>>     - makefile: mingw64 svn experimental/buildsystem/makebuildroot.mk
>>>>>     - compile instructions from mingw64 sourceforge wiki
>>>>> all with variations of multilib, gcc-versions, ld-versions etc...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it maybe be a good idea that someone who got the canadian cross
>>>>> running create a working Makefile? There are the excellent Makefiles
>>>>> "makebuildroot-test.mk" and "makebuildroot.mk" (from your project),
>>>>> that
>>>>> both follow the wiki compile instructions (more or less), but both fail
>>>>> in the pre-last step of ld linking.
>>>>> A working Makefile would be a good documentation, reference, and a
>>>>> perfect
>>>>> standard for regression testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> [0]
>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00839.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you link lib to lib64? And do you have lib32? Native cross-back
>>>> works fine for me.
>>>
>>> As I wrote above, I tried amongst many other things your (unmodified)
>>> makefile "makebuildroot-test.mk", so yes lib was linked to lib64.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are you talking about a triple cross? I tried
>>>> i686-linux->sparc-linux-mingw64 before, it works fine too.
>>>>
>>>> You might have better chance with makebuildroot-test.mk for canadian
>>>> cross, I've used it for the sparc triple cross.
>>>
>>> Hmm not sure I follow here. Have you a running canadian cross fro
>>> mingw-w64 on Linux? As I wrote above, I have tried the suggested
>>> "makebuildroot-test.mk" for canadian cross, and it fails with the
>>> described error: "make all-target-libgcc", message is:
>>>     [cut]/build/root/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld: skipping incompatible \
>>>     [cut]/build/root/mingw/lib/libmingw32.a when searching for -lmingw32
>>>
>>> Which revision of the makefile have you tested?
>>>
>>
>> Those are actually warnings, ld will continue to walk through the
>> directories. Can you post the last command and all of its errors/warnings?
>
> You are right, I posted the warnings only, sorry:( The error is that
> ld fails to find a compatible libmingw32. I don't have the log here
> right now, but can produce it if you like? Here a bit more information
> from my original post [0]:
>
> There are more identical errors for other libs like kernel32 and msvcrt.
>
> objdump lists the correct format:
>    [cut]/build/root/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-objdump --archive-headers \
>    [cut]/build/root/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/libmingw32.a
>      [...]
>      lib64_libmingw32_a-tlsmcrt.o:     file format pe-x86-64
>
> Also, ld seems to be valid:
>    [cut]/build/root/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: supported targets: \
>      pe-x86-64 pei-x86-64 elf64-x86-64 elf64-l1om elf64-little elf64-big \
>      elf32-little elf32-big srec symbolsrec verilog tekhex binary ihex
>
> Thanks JonY for your feedback!
>
>     Mario
>
>

Hi,

I suspect it was scanning for 32bit objects. 32bit support also seems to 
be missing in ld.

Check the makefile if you've enabled multilib options.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to