On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Chris Sutcliffe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> When compiling code that includes is fails at these lines: >>> >>> WINCOMMCTRLAPI BOOL WINAPI DPA_Grow(HDPA pdpa, IN int cp); >>> WINCOMMCTRLAPI int WINAPI DPA_InsertPtr(HDPA hdpa, IN int i, void *p); >>> WINCOMMCTRLAPI PVOID WINAPI DPA_GetPtr(HDPA hdpa, INT_PTR i); >>> WINCOMMCTRLAPI BOOL WINAPI DPA_SetPtr(HDPA hdpa, IN int i, void *p); >>> >>> due to 'IN' not being defined. Removing 'IN' corrects the issue. >>> >>> Chris >>> >> >> Just posted a patch for review to our list which removes them ;) > > Just to close the loop as I am prone to do, did that patch make it through? > >> I wonder, though, why do you not get the IN definition (as nothing) >> from through windef.h (or ntdef.h) ? > > Is this question worth pursuing at this point? >
No, I don't think so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
