On 11/9/2011 07:12, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:57 PM, JonY wrote:
>> So, you were planning to compress 64-bit executables without TLS using
>> UPX, but it doesn't support it anyway.
>>
>> If you are using UPX on 32-bit executables they work.
>>
>> I guess you don't really want UPX.
> 
> Did you have any new information, or did you just want to repeat what
> has already been said?
> 

No, I was just curious on why UPX was mentioned.

Other win64 exec packers are mentioned at the UPX forum
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/upx/forums/forum/6805/topic/1803140>.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to