On 11/25/2011 06:31, JonY wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 23:22, Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote:
>> I agree with Ruben Van Boxem.  It should be considered carefully.  I
>> don't recommend to include win-iconv without testing hardly.  Actually,
>> I don't use Windows (and win-iconv) for daily work.
>>
> 
> I suppose we can use some Unicode and multibyte stream verification code
> to wrap about the iconv input/output, this would be the hard part.
> 
>> If you want to develop win-iconv cooperatively, it is better to change
>> win-iconv's maintainer.  English is difficult for me.
>>
> 
> Change win-iconv maintainer?
> 
>> I can include change for MinGW.
>>
> 
> I do have MSVC installed, so I can at least make sure it builds correctly.
> 

Looks like there is a problem with binutils ld for mingw32 win32, weak
symbols don't get fixed up, strangely, win64 weak linking works perfectly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to